From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E18DECAAD2 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:15:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229512AbiH2PPV (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 11:15:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36594 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229475AbiH2PPS (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 11:15:18 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6FC222B09 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 08:15:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id m16so10573427wru.9 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 08:15:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=eb2xK2TBGaxA7bJGLTWxFduzhGTgxUYFBG2Zb62+v5g=; b=XupocN2NjVgSM1fkDjok8aOC1aONvGZeYuZXROn9vjVBeMDiOZGJEqGk5DsVvxIxWK +CEXaJY6olOFy49C/SS3MTa9in7ZOJxTP0gxvGx/LdHr4I4GnMxDh50u3Q0AupCzstm3 NPPj2oZhnSTRILO5Vh/uyjKLNdVQ/L6QmxxIlPirnLGOoxi/NXT6q+LdvGNDnCUo/9zJ ggw7XPHvi5YQDWw+eZTA4F06rc/LNHoLfzumlqB/x69crfLrkTzaCwQWTbT/P2UHXFdh seMEF5hWOnMwAFdlkszxzjFoi1GWcDZhXFGmsiLKS1HvQ1hw5gM1+mK+tpolBIiOv8Np Do6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=eb2xK2TBGaxA7bJGLTWxFduzhGTgxUYFBG2Zb62+v5g=; b=JW22RnOhk1ksBsi+lLS5Ojq0VrsrKualZvweESuuIK0jOuxmt3/ctnjd9PBz96X8Vw C5vFRNqRAJtePc3yfb0vJg3qY6U+1ScCnKZxQsq0IFzMGqNeieTRy1+QwZizwd4ZTkEx Y3B0/i0Da7DkPP15Rt7WY/mYOCp7nMYtIt5Cd4HcRMT+PhTq76BpSKyItlc19AaDoMb2 eabDVfSCP4BmF3KL9BkLfFWBb/NuMU6RPbte2he23rZk1IoeIfZjvHo9Z5/XTggusgod NdK7X8q6TuvQcPX812DQwy062XYdV55BHR4ZDeYwQH3vW/SCs44CbUIld378isAfzMqQ Cl1w== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0KADbsS5mwLCHJhk8PCmxq9aeMHvthOAf4PJVUPkmDQeiu+2V6 Vs2L0imat5YMr8Fet4RO32w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7XlCH+fyJFhjmhvgZktjQlirm6zNvN3F1MNqA/a7IX2u3113rAHgZ9QhzOCUP9Nyh8NUcmEQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5955:0:b0:226:dac4:a713 with SMTP id e21-20020a5d5955000000b00226dac4a713mr3151087wri.245.1661786116352; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 08:15:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (p200300c56f18a60054f4ba7ca0871a5f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:c5:6f18:a600:54f4:ba7c:a087:1a5f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l4-20020a05600c2cc400b003a502c23f2asm9665407wmc.16.2022.08.29.08.15.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 08:15:15 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\)) Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] mac80211: add TPC support in control path From: Jonas Jelonek In-Reply-To: <8867d4a7552fc036da51ef5451ead1fd4df7f139.camel@sipsolutions.net> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 17:15:14 +0200 Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Thomas_H=C3=BChn?= , linux-wireless , "nbd@nbd.name" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1E8EFC16-0702-4F02-8574-23DBE37C97C7@gmail.com> References: <20220829144147.484787-1-jelonek.jonas@gmail.com> <5175b7f95442eff1f8e899feee3d3aeb330fb61e.camel@sipsolutions.net> <5AA24131-A7E9-451D-97AB-97D925B2A53A@hs-nordhausen.de> <8867d4a7552fc036da51ef5451ead1fd4df7f139.camel@sipsolutions.net> To: Johannes Berg X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org I compile-tested with up-to-date wireless-next, should be 6.0? Is this sufficient? The changes in mac80211 regarding status path from me that were part of = 5.19 were manually included in my OpenWrt test, other changes not. We can = definitely try with the OpenWrt testing kernel as Thomas mentioned. Greetings Jonas > On 29. Aug 2022, at 16:52, Johannes Berg = wrote: >=20 > On Mon, 2022-08-29 at 16:51 +0200, Thomas H=C3=BChn wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> Compile-Tested: current wireless-next tree with all flags on >>>> Tested-on PCEngines APU with ath9k WiFi device on OpenWrt Linux >>>> Kernel 5.10.137 >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> That seems just a little old? Not sure I'd trust that given the = major >>> changes in the tree recently? >>=20 >> Good point, we can test this with 5.15.63 by enabling the OpenWrt = testing kernel =E2=80=A6 would that be ok ? >>=20 >=20 > Well a lot of major changes just happened 5.19 -> 6.0, so something = more > recent would be better? >=20 > johannes