From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.30] iwl3945: fix rfkill switch
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:49:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090804124951.GA3988@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1249389350-4158-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com>
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 02:35:50PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> Due to rfkill and iwlwifi mishmash of SW / HW killswitch representation,
> we have race conditions which make unable turn wifi radio on, after enable
> and disable again killswitch. I can observe this problem on my laptop
> with iwl3945 device.
>
> In rfkill core HW switch and SW switch are separate 'states'. Device can
> be only in one of 3 states: RFKILL_STATE_SOFT_BLOCKED, RFKILL_STATE_UNBLOCKED,
> RFKILL_STATE_HARD_BLOCKED. Whereas in iwlwifi driver we have separate bits
> STATUS_RF_KILL_HW and STATUS_RF_KILL_SW for HW and SW switches - radio can be
> turned on, only if both bits are cleared.
>
> In this particular race conditions, radio can not be turned on if in driver
> STATUS_RF_KILL_SW bit is set, and rfkill core is in state
> RFKILL_STATE_HARD_BLOCKED, because rfkill core is unable to call
> rfkill->toggle_radio(). This situation can be entered in case:
>
> - killswitch is turned on
> - rfkill core 'see' button change first and move to RFKILL_STATE_SOFT_BLOCKED
> also call ->toggle_radio() and STATE_RF_KILL_SW in driver is set
> - iwl3945 get info about button from hardware to set STATUS_RF_KILL_HW bit and
> force rfkill to move to RFKILL_STATE_HARD_BLOCKED
> - killsiwtch is turend off
> - driver clear STATUS_RF_KILL_HW
> - rfkill core is unable to clear STATUS_RF_KILL_SW in driver
>
> Additionally call to rfkill_epo() when STATUS_RF_KILL_HW in driver is set
> cause move to the same situation.
>
> In 2.6.31 this problem is fixed due to _total_ rewrite of rfkill subsystem.
> This is a quite small fix for 2.6.30.x in iwl3945 driver. We disable
> STATUS_RF_KILL_SW bit regardless of HW bit state. Also report to rfkill
> subsystem SW switch bit before HW switch bit to move rfkill subsystem
> to SOFT_BLOCK rather than HARD_BLOCK.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
> ---
> I'm not sure if this is good candidate for stable as this is not backport
> of upstream commit. Also I did not test this patch with other iwlwifi devices,
> only with iwl3945.
stable is about the only place it can go, since it fixes a problem
that doesn't exist in 2.6.31...
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
¡Viva Honduras Libre!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-04 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-04 12:35 [PATCH 2.6.30] iwl3945: fix rfkill switch Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-08-04 12:49 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2009-08-05 21:07 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2009-08-05 22:51 ` reinette chatre
2009-08-06 7:19 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-08-06 20:15 ` reinette chatre
2009-08-07 6:31 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-08-10 16:44 ` reinette chatre
2009-08-11 14:09 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-08-11 18:08 ` reinette chatre
2009-08-12 15:12 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-08-12 16:45 ` reinette chatre
2009-08-13 7:28 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2009-08-13 7:31 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090804124951.GA3988@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).