From: Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@gmail.com>
To: RHS Linux User <xxx@nei.mv.com>
Cc: Benoit PAPILLAULT <benoit.papillault@free.fr>,
"ath9k-devel" <ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: noise floor calibration process
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:53:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201004281453.39817.holgerschurig@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1100428051914.9331G-100000@nei>
> In the USA Amateur radio operators can use 1000 Watts (under certain
> conditions) !!
Don't count on the 1000 W. Most countries have tight restrictions, only
allowing certain frequencies, bandwiths, max PEP, max ERP, max EIRP, max
electric field, max magnetic fields.
In Germany, with my license class, I can use up to 75W PEP in the frequency
range 2320-2450 MHz. So, way less than 1000W. But I don't care, I wouldn't
want to use 1000 W anyway. That's quite dangerous, e.g. if someone moves too
near to the transmitting antenna.
> It is VERY surprising that no chips I am aware of provide directly for
> support of an external low noise preamp AND on a seperate coax a REAL
> amplifier.
However, as licensed ham radio op, I'm allowed to build and use self-build
equipment. That means, I'm not restricted to use only certified devices, e.g.
I don't need some FCC or ZZF or whatever number on my equipment. So I'm
perfectly eligible to add some pre-amp. And guess what, for frequencies above
100 MHz it's quite common to use low-noise pre-amps. Many HAMs do this, and
also every satellite dish LNB does this.
I don't no chip "allowing" me this, I simply attach the pre-amp as near to the
antenna as possible. How would a chip be able to prevent that anyway ?!?
Any WLAN chip provides for a separate coax. Again, how would a chip prevent
against that? Only some hybrid chip with built-in antenne could possible
prevent me doing that. But maybe you don't mean chips, but devices? Most USB
dongles that I've seen won't provide a coax connector. But I have a bunch of
PC-Card wlan cards with some SMA (or similar) coax connectors. And for Mini-
PCI cards it's the common case to provide some coax socket.
> Now two high powered, low noise Acess Points with a clear line of sight
> would give some real range!
Clear line of sight is nice, clear fresnel zone would be better.
Actually, what you're talking already happens already. It's called HAMNET.
Some english language link that I found:
http://db0fhn.efi.fh-nuernberg.de/doku.php?id=projects:wlan:hamnet
Oh, and they use atheros hardware :-)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-28 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-27 20:39 ath9k: noise floor calibration process Benoit PAPILLAULT
2010-04-28 0:01 ` [ath9k-devel] " RHS Linux User
2010-04-28 6:04 ` Benoit PAPILLAULT
2010-04-28 9:24 ` RHS Linux User
2010-04-28 12:53 ` Holger Schurig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201004281453.39817.holgerschurig@gmail.com \
--to=holgerschurig@gmail.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
--cc=benoit.papillault@free.fr \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xxx@nei.mv.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).