From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:45679 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755286Ab0D1UpL (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:45:11 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:33:04 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Stanislaw Gruszka Cc: Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mac80211: fix supported rates IE if AP doesn't give us it's rates Message-ID: <20100428203304.GB2912@tuxdriver.com> References: <1272460624-3611-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> <1272460624-3611-2-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> <20100428133336.GA2527@dhcp-lab-161.englab.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20100428133336.GA2527@dhcp-lab-161.englab.brq.redhat.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 03:33:37PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 03:17:04PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > If AP do not provide us supported rates before assiociation, send > > all rates we are supporting instead of empty information element. > > Please note these two patches together with "QoS fixes": > - mac80211: explicitly disable/enable QoS > - iwlwifi: manage QoS by mac stack > resolve: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558002 > > "QoS fixes" alone resolve: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539878 > > So I think we want all 4 patches in stable. > > John,if possible push patches to Linus tree. When they lend there, > I will post backported patches to stable ML. I have them already > prepared ant tested for 2.6.32 :) It is fairly late in the 2.6.34 cycle, and it isn't obvious to me that these fix any sort of regression. Am I wrong? John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.