From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:47466 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758637Ab0HDTom (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:44:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:34:42 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Dan Williams Cc: Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [wt PATCH 0/5] libertas: make association work again Message-ID: <20100804193442.GR17666@tuxdriver.com> References: <1280470034.14523.4.camel@dcbw.foobar.com> <1280471706.3710.5.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1280900467.2665.6.camel@dcbw.foobar.com> <1280907989.3768.0.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1280949346.11056.1.camel@dcbw.foobar.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1280949346.11056.1.camel@dcbw.foobar.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 02:15:46PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 09:46 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 00:41 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > > On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 08:35 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 23:07 -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > > > > This series makes libertas actually associate with APs after the > > > > > cfg80211 conversion. There was a pretty big TODO where if cfg80211 > > > > > didn't pass in the BSSID of the AP to associate with, then libertas > > > > > would fail because the firmware really, really, really wants a BSSID. > > > > > So lets do a scan to find that BSSID. The other notable change is > > > > > a fix to make sure all supported rates are included in the firmware's > > > > > association request, lack of which caused some APs to deny the attempt. > > > > > > > > I'm a bit tempted to say we could use the connect logic in cfg80211 to > > > > provide this? cfg80211 _already_ provides this if the hardware wants > > > > auth()/assoc() rather than connect() calls, so it seems fairly simple to > > > > also (optionally) do it here? > > > > > > Yeah, I thought about that too. Do you want me to work on that now > > > instead of letting this patch through? I can revert the relevant bits > > > of this later if that's acceptable too. > > > > Either way works for me since I don't care about any cruft in > > libertas ;) > > John, if you don't mind applying this patch I'll work on generic > scan-before-connect support in cfg80211 in a further patch series. OK...which of these need to be in 2.6.36? John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.