From: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
To: "RA-Jay Hung" <Jay_Hung@ralinktech.com>
Cc: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com" <users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] rt2x00: Modify rt2x00queue_remove_l2pad to make skb->data two-byte alignment
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:48:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201011171148.04286.helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B7288B2B5878D747BA031EF4B170D7F6BC5C60@TWHCMBS01.tw.ralinktech.ad>
Am Mittwoch 17 November 2010 schrieb RA-Jay Hung:
> > > When inserting the l2pad we're moving the header and thus reduce headroom.
> > > This patch modifies the bahavior during l2pad removal to not move the header
> > > back into its old position but instead moves the payload. Thus the skb keeps
> > > the reduced headroom. If this skb gets requeued into rt2x00 (which can happen
> > > when the frame wasn't acked and the according STA is known to e in powersave
> > > mode) the header and payload get aligned again further reducing headroom which
> > > results in a too small headroom for the TXWI and thus a skb_under_panic.
> >
> > Hmm, John merged that patch already. However, I would prefer if it would get
> > reverted due to the occasional panics in AP mode.
> >
> > Jay, I didn't notice any performance degradation on MIPS, on which architecture
> > did you test?
>
> My test environment as below
> Architecture is AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core, and use rt3070 to test throughput.
> Before not patch code, the throughput just only 5, 6M, but after patch,
> throughput can achieve about 40M on open air. How about your test?
I tried with rt2800pci on MIPS32 in AP mode (STA <- eth -> AP <- wifi -> STA2).
An UDP iperf stream (STA -> STA2) was able to achieve up to 90Mbps while a TCP
stream maxed out at around 70Mbps (before and after this patch). STA2 is an
Intel HT20 11n client.
Hmm, you've been testing on USB. Maybe that makes a difference?
Nevertheless, such a performance drop on such a fast machine is likely caused
by something different, no? Did you have any warnings in dmesg (due to
watchdog timeouts for example)? Maybe the rate control algorithm made a wrong
decision and used a low tx rate?
> > Jay, Ivo, any objections against reverting this one?
>
> I agree to revert this one because this will cause tool small headroom of your mention.
> We need to supply another patch when resolve all issue. Thanks.
John, should I send a follow-up (with a nice description why it this is needed)
or are you simply reverting this one?
Thanks,
Helmut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-17 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-13 18:08 [PATCH 1/9] rt2x00: Increase REGISTER_BUSY_COUNT Ivo van Doorn
2010-11-13 18:09 ` [PATCH 2/9] rt2x00: Add initial support for RT3370/RT3390 devices Ivo van Doorn
2010-11-13 18:10 ` [PATCH 3/9] rt2x00: Clean up Kconfig for RT2800 devices Ivo van Doorn
2010-11-13 18:10 ` [PATCH 4/9] rt2x00: Remove RT30XX Kconfig variables Ivo van Doorn
2010-11-13 18:10 ` [PATCH 5/9] rt2x00: Remove unneccessary internal Kconfig symbols Ivo van Doorn
2010-11-13 18:11 ` [PATCH 6/9] rt2x00: Use ioremap for SoC devices instead of KSEG1ADDR Ivo van Doorn
2010-11-13 18:11 ` [PATCH 7/9] rt2x00: Fix rt2800 USB TX Path DMA issue Ivo van Doorn
2010-11-13 18:12 ` [PATCH 8/9] rt2x00: Fix header_length in rt2x00lib_txdone Ivo van Doorn
2010-11-13 18:13 ` [PATCH 9/9] rt2x00: Modify rt2x00queue_remove_l2pad to make skb->data two-byte alignment Ivo van Doorn
2010-11-16 15:45 ` Helmut Schaa
2010-11-17 8:46 ` Helmut Schaa
2010-11-17 10:16 ` RA-Jay Hung
2010-11-17 10:48 ` Helmut Schaa [this message]
2010-11-17 15:07 ` John W. Linville
2010-11-17 15:34 ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2010-11-17 16:41 ` Helmut Schaa
2010-11-18 1:47 ` [rt2x00-users] " David Ellingsworth
2010-11-22 7:00 ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2010-11-22 8:14 ` RA-Jay Hung
2010-11-22 10:05 ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2010-11-22 10:22 ` Helmut Schaa
2010-11-16 15:36 ` [PATCH 8/9] rt2x00: Fix header_length in rt2x00lib_txdone Helmut Schaa
2010-11-15 9:45 ` [PATCH 7/9] rt2x00: Fix rt2800 USB TX Path DMA issue Walter Goldens
2010-11-16 1:59 ` RA-Jay Hung
2010-11-16 15:59 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2010-11-16 16:11 ` Helmut Schaa
2010-11-16 16:34 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2010-11-16 16:42 ` Helmut Schaa
2010-11-16 16:53 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2010-11-16 17:00 ` Helmut Schaa
[not found] ` <AANLkTi=ANfE3s8RUmS5=qyofqHM2geRnatK-eCUjovEc@mail.gmail.com>
2010-11-16 19:06 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2010-11-16 19:23 ` Ivo Van Doorn
2010-11-16 19:26 ` Johannes Berg
2010-11-16 19:33 ` Ivo Van Doorn
2010-11-14 8:59 ` [PATCH 3/9] rt2x00: Clean up Kconfig for RT2800 devices Julian Calaby
2010-11-14 9:00 ` Julian Calaby
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201011171148.04286.helmut.schaa@googlemail.com \
--to=helmut.schaa@googlemail.com \
--cc=Jay_Hung@ralinktech.com \
--cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).