linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org>
To: Brian Prodoehl <bprodoehl@gmail.com>
Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net, linville@tuxdriver.com,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>,
	libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org,
	Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>,
	Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>,
	users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: Extend channel to frequency mapping for 802.11j
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:17:40 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201101111817.40309.br1@einfach.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimYjvJbm9DPPDWWCsD76_DnFcBG3a2Z_B8Mhpzm@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat January 8 2011 22:08:41 Brian Prodoehl wrote:
> I guess I saw what I wanted to see when I took a second look at the
> re-posted patch.  Here are compile-fixes to all the affected drivers.
> The following drivers are affected: mwl8k, iwlwifi, iwmc3200wifi,
> libertas, rt2x00, wl1251 and wl12xx.  So I guess these driver fixes
> need to be split into seven patches.  I don't use any of these
> drivers, so I can't really vouch for if I'm pulling the band the
> correct way for each.  I'm happy to split and submit, but I wouldn't
> mind another set of eyes on these changes.

Thanks! I would say these changes have to be merged with my patch, so it can 
be applied without breaking git bisect for the affected drivers.

> compat-wireless-2011-01-07.orig/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/cfg.c	2011-0
> 1-07 15:03:59.000000000 -0500
> +++
> compat-wireless-2011-01-07/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/cfg.c	2011-01-08
> 07:51:23.947290769 -0500
> @@ -607,7 +607,8 @@
>  		/* No channel, no luck */
>  		if (chan_no != -1) {
>  			struct wiphy *wiphy = priv->wdev->wiphy;
> -			int freq = ieee80211_channel_to_frequency(chan_no);
> +			int freq = ieee80211_channel_to_frequency(chan_no,
> +					chan_no <= 14 ? IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ : 
IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ);

The whole point of having the band argument is to avoid this. We now have 
overlapping channel numbers: channel 8 and 12 are defined in 5GHz as well as 
in 2.4GHz (that is for 20MHz channel width, there are more for 10 and 5MHz 
width, but we don't support that yet). The band has to come from the hardware 
or driver configuration.

> @@ -1597,7 +1598,8 @@
>  	lbs_deb_enter(LBS_DEB_CFG80211);
> 
>  	survey->channel = ieee80211_get_channel(wiphy,
> -		ieee80211_channel_to_frequency(priv->channel));
> +		ieee80211_channel_to_frequency(priv->channel,
> +			priv->channel <= 14 ? IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ : IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ));

Same here.

> compat-wireless-2011-01-07.orig/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00dev.c	20
> 11-01-07 15:03:59.000000000 -0500
> +++
> compat-wireless-2011-01-07/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00dev.c	
2011-01
> -08 07:51:23.971290769 -0500
> @@ -649,7 +649,8 @@
>  			      const int channel, const int tx_power,
>  			      const int value)
>  {
> -	entry->center_freq = ieee80211_channel_to_frequency(channel);
> +	entry->center_freq = ieee80211_channel_to_frequency(channel,
> +			channel <= 14 ? IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ : IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ);

And here.

So the two problematic drivers are libertas and rt2x00. I'm Cc'ing the 
maintainers, and hope that they have better insight into how to fix this than 
we. 

bruno

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-11  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-07  5:26 [PATCH] cfg80211: Extend channel to frequency mapping for 802.11j Bruno Randolf
2011-01-07 11:43 ` Johannes Berg
2011-01-07 12:45 ` Brian Prodoehl
2011-01-07 12:53   ` Brian Prodoehl
2011-01-08  3:43     ` Bruno Randolf
2011-01-08 13:08       ` Brian Prodoehl
2011-01-11  9:17         ` Bruno Randolf [this message]
2011-01-11 12:18           ` Johannes Berg
2011-01-11 13:16             ` Brian Prodoehl
2011-01-11 15:09               ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201101111817.40309.br1@einfach.org \
    --to=br1@einfach.org \
    --cc=IvDoorn@gmail.com \
    --cc=bprodoehl@gmail.com \
    --cc=dcbw@redhat.com \
    --cc=gwingerde@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).