From: Ian Molton <ian@mnementh.co.uk>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com, franky.lin@broadcom.com,
hante.meuleman@broadcom.com
Subject: [PATCH 21/29] brcmfmac: Simplify chip probe routine
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 17:16:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170717161637.4652-22-ian@mnementh.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170717161637.4652-1-ian@mnementh.co.uk>
* Renamed routine in line with kernel convention.
* Improved handling of chips that cannot autoprobe
Signed-off-by: Ian Molton <ian@mnementh.co.uk>
---
.../wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c | 130 +++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c
index 38794d7c1da8..b3b28e78c49d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c
@@ -223,17 +223,6 @@ struct sbsocramregs {
#define ARMCR4_BSZ_MASK 0x3f
#define ARMCR4_BSZ_MULT 8192
-
-static void brcmf_chip_sb_corerev(struct brcmf_chip *ci,
- struct brcmf_core *core)
-{
- u32 regdata;
-
- regdata = ci->ops->read32(ci->ctx, CORE_SB(core->base, sbidhigh));
-
- core->rev = SBCOREREV(regdata);
-}
-
static bool brcmf_chip_sb_iscoreup(struct brcmf_core *core)
{
struct brcmf_chip *ci = core->chip;
@@ -482,7 +471,7 @@ static char *brcmf_chip_name(uint chipid, char *buf, uint len)
return buf;
}
-static struct brcmf_core *brcmf_chip_add_core(struct brcmf_chip *ci,
+static struct brcmf_core *__brcmf_chip_add_core(struct brcmf_chip *ci,
u16 coreid, u32 base,
u32 wrapbase)
{
@@ -490,7 +479,7 @@ static struct brcmf_core *brcmf_chip_add_core(struct brcmf_chip *ci,
core = kzalloc(sizeof(*core), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!core)
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ return NULL;
core->id = coreid;
core->base = base;
@@ -502,6 +491,41 @@ static struct brcmf_core *brcmf_chip_add_core(struct brcmf_chip *ci,
return core;
}
+static struct brcmf_core *brcmf_chip_add_sb_core(struct brcmf_chip *ci,
+ u16 coreid, u32 base,
+ u32 wrapbase)
+{
+ struct brcmf_core *core;
+ u32 regdata;
+
+ core = __brcmf_chip_add_core(ci, coreid, base, wrapbase);
+
+ if (!core)
+ goto out;
+
+ regdata = ci->ops->read32(ci->ctx, CORE_SB(core->base, sbidhigh));
+
+ core->rev = SBCOREREV(regdata);
+
+out:
+ return core;
+}
+
+static struct brcmf_core *brcmf_chip_add_axi_core(struct brcmf_chip *ci,
+ u16 coreid, u32 base,
+ u32 wrapbase, u8 rev)
+{
+ struct brcmf_core *core;
+
+ core = __brcmf_chip_add_core(ci, coreid, base, wrapbase);
+
+ if (core)
+ core->rev = rev;
+
+ return core;
+}
+
+
/* safety check for chipinfo */
static int brcmf_chip_cores_check(struct brcmf_chip *ci)
{
@@ -900,19 +924,42 @@ int brcmf_chip_dmp_erom_scan(struct brcmf_chip *ci)
continue;
/* finally a core to be added */
- core = brcmf_chip_add_core(ci, id, base, wrap);
- if (IS_ERR(core))
- return PTR_ERR(core);
-
- core->rev = rev;
+ core = brcmf_chip_add_axi_core(ci, id, base, wrap, rev);
+ if (!core)
+ return -ENOMEM; //FIXME - and cleanup the allocated cores?
}
return 0;
}
-static int brcmf_chip_recognition(struct brcmf_chip *ci)
+struct brcmf_chip_desc {
+ u16 id;
+ u32 base;
+};
+
+static struct brcmf_chip_desc brcmf_4329[] = {
+ { BCMA_CORE_CHIPCOMMON, SI_ENUM_BASE },
+ { BCMA_CORE_SDIO_DEV, BCM4329_CORE_BUS_BASE },
+ { BCMA_CORE_INTERNAL_MEM, BCM4329_CORE_SOCRAM_BASE },
+ { BCMA_CORE_ARM_CM3, BCM4329_CORE_ARM_BASE },
+ { BCMA_CORE_80211, 0x18001000 },
+ { 0 , 0},
+};
+
+static int brcmf_chip_add_static(struct brcmf_chip *ci,
+ struct brcmf_chip_desc *desc)
+{
+ for ( ; desc->id ; desc++ )
+ brcmf_chip_add_sb_core(ci, desc->id, desc->base, 0);
+
+ //FIXME: cleanup if we fail to add a core?
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+
+static int brcmf_chip_probe(struct brcmf_chip *ci)
{
- struct brcmf_core *core;
u32 regdata;
u32 socitype;
int ret;
@@ -920,11 +967,13 @@ static int brcmf_chip_recognition(struct brcmf_chip *ci)
/* Get CC core rev
* Chipid is assume to be at offset 0 from SI_ENUM_BASE
* For different chiptypes or old sdio hosts w/o chipcommon,
- * other ways of recognition should be added here.
+ * other ways of to probe should be added here.
*/
regdata = ci->ops->read32(ci->ctx, CORE_CC_REG(SI_ENUM_BASE, chipid));
+
ci->chip = regdata & CID_ID_MASK;
ci->chiprev = (regdata & CID_REV_MASK) >> CID_REV_SHIFT;
+
socitype = (regdata & CID_TYPE_MASK) >> CID_TYPE_SHIFT;
brcmf_chip_name(ci->chip, ci->name, sizeof(ci->name));
@@ -936,43 +985,32 @@ static int brcmf_chip_recognition(struct brcmf_chip *ci)
switch(socitype) {
case SOCI_SB:
- if (ci->chip != BRCM_CC_4329_CHIP_ID) {
- brcmf_err("SB chip is not supported\n");
- return -ENODEV;
+ switch(ci->chip) {
+ case BRCM_CC_4329_CHIP_ID:
+ ret = brcmf_chip_add_static(ci, brcmf_4329);
+ break;
+ default:
+ brcmf_err("SB chip is not supported\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
}
+ if(!ret)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
ci->iscoreup = brcmf_chip_sb_iscoreup;
ci->coredisable = brcmf_chip_sb_coredisable;
ci->resetcore = brcmf_chip_sb_resetcore;
- core = brcmf_chip_add_core(ci, BCMA_CORE_CHIPCOMMON,
- SI_ENUM_BASE, 0);
- brcmf_chip_sb_corerev(ci, core);
-
- core = brcmf_chip_add_core(ci, BCMA_CORE_SDIO_DEV,
- BCM4329_CORE_BUS_BASE, 0);
- brcmf_chip_sb_corerev(ci, core);
-
- core = brcmf_chip_add_core(ci, BCMA_CORE_INTERNAL_MEM,
- BCM4329_CORE_SOCRAM_BASE, 0);
- brcmf_chip_sb_corerev(ci, core);
-
- core = brcmf_chip_add_core(ci, BCMA_CORE_ARM_CM3,
- BCM4329_CORE_ARM_BASE, 0);
- brcmf_chip_sb_corerev(ci, core);
-
- core = brcmf_chip_add_core(ci, BCMA_CORE_80211, 0x18001000, 0);
- brcmf_chip_sb_corerev(ci, core);
-
break;
case SOCI_AXI:
+ if (brcmf_chip_dmp_erom_scan(ci))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
ci->iscoreup = brcmf_chip_ai_iscoreup;
ci->coredisable = brcmf_chip_ai_coredisable;
ci->resetcore = brcmf_chip_ai_resetcore;
- brcmf_chip_dmp_erom_scan(ci);
-
break;
default:
brcmf_err("chip backplane type %u is not supported\n",
@@ -1093,7 +1131,7 @@ struct brcmf_chip *brcmf_chip_attach(void *ctx,
if (err < 0)
goto fail;
- err = brcmf_chip_recognition(chip);
+ err = brcmf_chip_probe(chip);
if (err < 0)
goto fail;
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-17 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-17 16:16 PATCH: brcmfmac driver cleanup Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 01/29] brcmfmac: Fix parameter order in brcmf_sdiod_f0_writeb() Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 02/29] brcmfmac: Register sizes on hardware are not dependent on compiler types Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 03/29] brcmfmac: Split brcmf_sdiod_regrw_helper() up Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 04/29] brcmfmac: Clean up brcmf_sdiod_set_sbaddr_window() Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 05/29] brcmfmac: Remove dead IO code Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 06/29] brcmfmac: Remove bandaid for SleepCSR Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 07/29] brcmfmac: Remove brcmf_sdiod_request_data() Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 08/29] brcmfmac: Fix uninitialised variable Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 09/29] brcmfmac: Remove noisy debugging Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 10/29] brcmfmac: Rename bcmerror to err Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 11/29] brcmfmac: Split brcmf_sdiod_buffrw function up Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 12/29] brcmfmac: Replace old IO functions with simpler ones Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 13/29] brcmfmac: Tidy register definitions a little Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 14/29] brcmfmac: Remove brcmf_sdiod_addrprep() Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 15/29] brcmfamc: remove unnecessary call to brcmf_sdiod_set_backplane_window() Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 16/29] brcmfmac: Cleanup offsetof() Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 17/29] brcmfmac: Remove unused macro Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 18/29] brcmfmac: Rename SOC_AI to SOC_AXI Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 19/29] brcmfmac: Get rid of chip_priv and core_priv structs Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 20/29] brcmfmac: Whitespace patch Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` Ian Molton [this message]
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 22/29] brcmfmac: Rename axi functions for clarity Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 23/29] brcmfmac: HUGE cleanup of IO access functions Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 24/29] brcmfmac: Rename chip.ctx -> chip.bus_priv Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 25/29] brcmfmac: Remove repeated calls to brcmf_chip_get_core() Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 26/29] brcmfmac: General cleaning up. whitespace and comments fix Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 27/29] brcmfmac: Remove {r,w}_sdreg32 Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 28/29] brcmfmac: Rename buscore->core for consistency Ian Molton
2017-07-20 7:00 ` kbuild test robot
2017-07-20 17:45 ` Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 29/29] brcmfmac: HACK - stabilise the value of ->sbwad in use for some xfer routines Ian Molton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170717161637.4652-22-ian@mnementh.co.uk \
--to=ian@mnementh.co.uk \
--cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
--cc=franky.lin@broadcom.com \
--cc=hante.meuleman@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).