linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Molton <ian@mnementh.co.uk>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com, franky.lin@broadcom.com,
	hante.meuleman@broadcom.com
Subject: [PATCH 21/29] brcmfmac: Simplify chip probe routine
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 17:16:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170717161637.4652-22-ian@mnementh.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170717161637.4652-1-ian@mnementh.co.uk>

* Renamed routine in line with kernel convention.
* Improved handling of chips that cannot autoprobe

Signed-off-by: Ian Molton <ian@mnementh.co.uk>
---
 .../wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c    | 130 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c
index 38794d7c1da8..b3b28e78c49d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c
@@ -223,17 +223,6 @@ struct sbsocramregs {
 #define	ARMCR4_BSZ_MASK		0x3f
 #define	ARMCR4_BSZ_MULT		8192
 
-
-static void brcmf_chip_sb_corerev(struct brcmf_chip *ci,
-				  struct brcmf_core *core)
-{
-	u32 regdata;
-
-	regdata = ci->ops->read32(ci->ctx, CORE_SB(core->base, sbidhigh));
-
-	core->rev = SBCOREREV(regdata);
-}
-
 static bool brcmf_chip_sb_iscoreup(struct brcmf_core *core)
 {
 	struct brcmf_chip *ci = core->chip;
@@ -482,7 +471,7 @@ static char *brcmf_chip_name(uint chipid, char *buf, uint len)
 	return buf;
 }
 
-static struct brcmf_core *brcmf_chip_add_core(struct brcmf_chip *ci,
+static struct brcmf_core *__brcmf_chip_add_core(struct brcmf_chip *ci,
 					      u16 coreid, u32 base,
 					      u32 wrapbase)
 {
@@ -490,7 +479,7 @@ static struct brcmf_core *brcmf_chip_add_core(struct brcmf_chip *ci,
 
 	core = kzalloc(sizeof(*core), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!core)
-		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+		return NULL;
 
 	core->id = coreid;
 	core->base = base;
@@ -502,6 +491,41 @@ static struct brcmf_core *brcmf_chip_add_core(struct brcmf_chip *ci,
 	return core;
 }
 
+static struct brcmf_core *brcmf_chip_add_sb_core(struct brcmf_chip *ci,
+					      u16 coreid, u32 base,
+					      u32 wrapbase)
+{
+	struct brcmf_core *core;
+	u32 regdata;
+
+	core = __brcmf_chip_add_core(ci, coreid, base, wrapbase);
+
+	if (!core)
+		goto out;
+
+	regdata = ci->ops->read32(ci->ctx, CORE_SB(core->base, sbidhigh));
+
+	core->rev = SBCOREREV(regdata);
+
+out:
+	return core;
+}
+
+static struct brcmf_core *brcmf_chip_add_axi_core(struct brcmf_chip *ci,
+					      u16 coreid, u32 base,
+					      u32 wrapbase, u8 rev)
+{
+	struct brcmf_core *core;
+
+	core = __brcmf_chip_add_core(ci, coreid, base, wrapbase);
+
+	if (core)
+		core->rev = rev;
+
+	return core;
+}
+
+
 /* safety check for chipinfo */
 static int brcmf_chip_cores_check(struct brcmf_chip *ci)
 {
@@ -900,19 +924,42 @@ int brcmf_chip_dmp_erom_scan(struct brcmf_chip *ci)
 			continue;
 
 		/* finally a core to be added */
-		core = brcmf_chip_add_core(ci, id, base, wrap);
-		if (IS_ERR(core))
-			return PTR_ERR(core);
-
-		core->rev = rev;
+		core = brcmf_chip_add_axi_core(ci, id, base, wrap, rev);
+		if (!core)
+			return -ENOMEM; //FIXME - and cleanup the allocated cores?
 	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int brcmf_chip_recognition(struct brcmf_chip *ci)
+struct brcmf_chip_desc {
+	u16 id;
+	u32 base;
+};
+
+static struct brcmf_chip_desc brcmf_4329[] = {
+	{ BCMA_CORE_CHIPCOMMON,   SI_ENUM_BASE },
+	{ BCMA_CORE_SDIO_DEV,     BCM4329_CORE_BUS_BASE },
+	{ BCMA_CORE_INTERNAL_MEM, BCM4329_CORE_SOCRAM_BASE },
+	{ BCMA_CORE_ARM_CM3,      BCM4329_CORE_ARM_BASE },
+	{ BCMA_CORE_80211,        0x18001000 },
+	{ 0 , 0},
+};
+
+static int brcmf_chip_add_static(struct brcmf_chip *ci,
+				struct brcmf_chip_desc *desc)
+{
+	for ( ; desc->id ; desc++ )
+		brcmf_chip_add_sb_core(ci, desc->id, desc->base, 0);
+
+	//FIXME: cleanup if we fail to add a core?
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+
+static int brcmf_chip_probe(struct brcmf_chip *ci)
 {
-	struct brcmf_core *core;
 	u32 regdata;
 	u32 socitype;
 	int ret;
@@ -920,11 +967,13 @@ static int brcmf_chip_recognition(struct brcmf_chip *ci)
 	/* Get CC core rev
 	 * Chipid is assume to be at offset 0 from SI_ENUM_BASE
 	 * For different chiptypes or old sdio hosts w/o chipcommon,
-	 * other ways of recognition should be added here.
+	 * other ways of to probe should be added here.
 	 */
 	regdata = ci->ops->read32(ci->ctx, CORE_CC_REG(SI_ENUM_BASE, chipid));
+
 	ci->chip = regdata & CID_ID_MASK;
 	ci->chiprev = (regdata & CID_REV_MASK) >> CID_REV_SHIFT;
+
 	socitype = (regdata & CID_TYPE_MASK) >> CID_TYPE_SHIFT;
 
 	brcmf_chip_name(ci->chip, ci->name, sizeof(ci->name));
@@ -936,43 +985,32 @@ static int brcmf_chip_recognition(struct brcmf_chip *ci)
 	switch(socitype) {
 		case SOCI_SB:
 
-		if (ci->chip != BRCM_CC_4329_CHIP_ID) {
-			brcmf_err("SB chip is not supported\n");
-			return -ENODEV;
+		switch(ci->chip) {
+			case BRCM_CC_4329_CHIP_ID:
+				ret = brcmf_chip_add_static(ci, brcmf_4329);
+				break;
+			default:
+				brcmf_err("SB chip is not supported\n");
+				return -ENODEV;
 		}
 
+		if(!ret)
+			return -ENODEV;
+
 		ci->iscoreup = brcmf_chip_sb_iscoreup;
 		ci->coredisable = brcmf_chip_sb_coredisable;
 		ci->resetcore = brcmf_chip_sb_resetcore;
 
-		core = brcmf_chip_add_core(ci, BCMA_CORE_CHIPCOMMON,
-					   SI_ENUM_BASE, 0);
-		brcmf_chip_sb_corerev(ci, core);
-
-		core = brcmf_chip_add_core(ci, BCMA_CORE_SDIO_DEV,
-					   BCM4329_CORE_BUS_BASE, 0);
-		brcmf_chip_sb_corerev(ci, core);
-
-		core = brcmf_chip_add_core(ci, BCMA_CORE_INTERNAL_MEM,
-					   BCM4329_CORE_SOCRAM_BASE, 0);
-		brcmf_chip_sb_corerev(ci, core);
-
-		core = brcmf_chip_add_core(ci, BCMA_CORE_ARM_CM3,
-					   BCM4329_CORE_ARM_BASE, 0);
-		brcmf_chip_sb_corerev(ci, core);
-
-		core = brcmf_chip_add_core(ci, BCMA_CORE_80211, 0x18001000, 0);
-		brcmf_chip_sb_corerev(ci, core);
-
 		break;
 	case SOCI_AXI:
 
+		if (brcmf_chip_dmp_erom_scan(ci))
+			return -ENODEV;
+
 		ci->iscoreup = brcmf_chip_ai_iscoreup;
 		ci->coredisable = brcmf_chip_ai_coredisable;
 		ci->resetcore = brcmf_chip_ai_resetcore;
 
-		brcmf_chip_dmp_erom_scan(ci);
-
 		break;
 	default:
 		brcmf_err("chip backplane type %u is not supported\n",
@@ -1093,7 +1131,7 @@ struct brcmf_chip *brcmf_chip_attach(void *ctx,
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto fail;
 
-	err = brcmf_chip_recognition(chip);
+	err = brcmf_chip_probe(chip);
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto fail;
 
-- 
2.11.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-17 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-17 16:16 PATCH: brcmfmac driver cleanup Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 01/29] brcmfmac: Fix parameter order in brcmf_sdiod_f0_writeb() Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 02/29] brcmfmac: Register sizes on hardware are not dependent on compiler types Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 03/29] brcmfmac: Split brcmf_sdiod_regrw_helper() up Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 04/29] brcmfmac: Clean up brcmf_sdiod_set_sbaddr_window() Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 05/29] brcmfmac: Remove dead IO code Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 06/29] brcmfmac: Remove bandaid for SleepCSR Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 07/29] brcmfmac: Remove brcmf_sdiod_request_data() Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 08/29] brcmfmac: Fix uninitialised variable Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 09/29] brcmfmac: Remove noisy debugging Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 10/29] brcmfmac: Rename bcmerror to err Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 11/29] brcmfmac: Split brcmf_sdiod_buffrw function up Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 12/29] brcmfmac: Replace old IO functions with simpler ones Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 13/29] brcmfmac: Tidy register definitions a little Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 14/29] brcmfmac: Remove brcmf_sdiod_addrprep() Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 15/29] brcmfamc: remove unnecessary call to brcmf_sdiod_set_backplane_window() Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 16/29] brcmfmac: Cleanup offsetof() Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 17/29] brcmfmac: Remove unused macro Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 18/29] brcmfmac: Rename SOC_AI to SOC_AXI Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 19/29] brcmfmac: Get rid of chip_priv and core_priv structs Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 20/29] brcmfmac: Whitespace patch Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` Ian Molton [this message]
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 22/29] brcmfmac: Rename axi functions for clarity Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 23/29] brcmfmac: HUGE cleanup of IO access functions Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 24/29] brcmfmac: Rename chip.ctx -> chip.bus_priv Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 25/29] brcmfmac: Remove repeated calls to brcmf_chip_get_core() Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 26/29] brcmfmac: General cleaning up. whitespace and comments fix Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 27/29] brcmfmac: Remove {r,w}_sdreg32 Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 28/29] brcmfmac: Rename buscore->core for consistency Ian Molton
2017-07-20  7:00   ` kbuild test robot
2017-07-20 17:45     ` Ian Molton
2017-07-17 16:16 ` [PATCH 29/29] brcmfmac: HACK - stabilise the value of ->sbwad in use for some xfer routines Ian Molton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170717161637.4652-22-ian@mnementh.co.uk \
    --to=ian@mnementh.co.uk \
    --cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
    --cc=franky.lin@broadcom.com \
    --cc=hante.meuleman@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).