linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Jeroen Roovers <jer@airfi.aero>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	"Randy Oostdyk" <linux-kernel@oostdyk.com>,
	"Tomislav Požega" <pozega.tomislav@gmail.com>,
	"Daniel Golle" <daniel@makrotopia.org>,
	"Felix Fietkau" <nbd@nbd.name>, "Mathias Kresin" <dev@kresin.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] rt2x00: check number of EPROTO errors
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:09:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190107150912.GA9516@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANCHnQoU-PPTotVD-MmCKCjtoVZEx7Nj4+5YGyfYBEKb2+VNdQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 01:47:19PM +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 16:16, Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Some USB host devices/drivers on some conditions can always return
> > EPROTO error on submitted URBs. That can cause infinity loop in the
> > rt2x00 driver.
> >
> > Since we can have single EPROTO errors we can not mark as device as
> > removed to avoid infinity loop. However we can count consecutive
> > EPROTO errors and mark device as removed if get lot of it.
> > I choose number 10 as threshold.
> >
> > Reported-and-tested-by: Randy Oostdyk <linux-kernel@oostdyk.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00usb.c
> > index 086aad22743d..60b8bccab83d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00usb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00usb.c
> > @@ -31,6 +31,22 @@
> >  #include "rt2x00.h"
> >  #include "rt2x00usb.h"
> >
> > +static bool rt2x00usb_check_usb_error(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev, int status)
> > +{
> > +       if (status == -ENODEV || status == -ENOENT)
> 
> I am not sure about this, but it looks to me like you would never see
> ENOENT, but ETIMEDOUT:
> 
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/usb/core/message.c#L64
> 
> In usb_start_wait_urb ETIMEDOUT is returned instead of ENOENT and
> passed up the chain.
> 
>      retval = (ctx.status == -ENOENT ? -ETIMEDOUT : ctx.status);
> 
> 
> Maybe I am wrong about this, but then again I have neither ever seen
> the driver respond to an ENOENT like this when an RT5592
> "disappeared".

According to Documentation/driver-api/usb/error-codes.rst 
ENOENT is valid error code when interface does not exist or
when URB was unlinked.

Regards
Stanislaw

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-07 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-20 15:16 [PATCH v2 1/3] rt2x00: use ratelimited variants dev_warn/dev_err Stanislaw Gruszka
2018-12-20 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] rt2x00: check number of EPROTO errors Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-01-07 12:47   ` Jeroen Roovers
2019-01-07 15:09     ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2019-01-08  9:30       ` Jeroen Roovers
2019-01-08 10:09         ` Jeroen Roovers
2019-01-08 11:04         ` Tom Psyborg
2019-01-09  6:17           ` Jeroen Roovers
2019-01-09 11:33             ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-01-10  7:49               ` Jeroen Roovers
2019-01-10 14:29                 ` Jeroen Roovers
2019-01-16 11:11                   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-01-22 17:32                   ` Jeroen Roovers
2019-02-12 15:02                     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2018-12-20 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] rt2x00: do not print error when queue is full Stanislaw Gruszka
2018-12-20 17:52   ` Tom Psyborg
2018-12-21  9:59     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2018-12-22 13:12       ` Tom Psyborg
2018-12-25 22:43         ` Tom Psyborg
2018-12-27 10:32           ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2018-12-27 10:25         ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2018-12-28  0:45           ` Tom Psyborg
2019-01-02  8:19             ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-09 11:03               ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-09 11:11                 ` Tom Psyborg
2019-02-09 11:56                   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-09 12:28                     ` Tom Psyborg
2019-02-09 15:38                       ` Daniel Golle
2019-02-09 16:29                         ` Tom Psyborg
2019-02-09 17:28                           ` Daniel Golle
2019-03-19  2:37                             ` Tom Psyborg
2019-02-10  9:57                       ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2018-12-21 11:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] rt2x00: use ratelimited variants dev_warn/dev_err Joe Perches
2018-12-21 11:57   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2018-12-21 12:48     ` Joe Perches
2018-12-21 12:51       ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-01-29 12:30     ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190107150912.GA9516@redhat.com \
    --to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@makrotopia.org \
    --cc=dev@kresin.me \
    --cc=jer@airfi.aero \
    --cc=linux-kernel@oostdyk.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    --cc=pozega.tomislav@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).