linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Minas Harutyunyan <hminas@synopsys.com>,
	USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] mt76x0u: Probing issues on Raspberry Pi 3 B+
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:54:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190214095420.GB17273@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878a7160-2e91-d057-6d27-c6b9d85f700e@i2se.com>

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:48:15AM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Stanislaw,
> 
> Am 14.02.19 um 10:25 schrieb Stanislaw Gruszka:
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 07:49:57AM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> >> Hi Stanislaw,
> >>
> >>> Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> hat am 12. Februar 2019 um 10:30 geschrieben:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> In usb_sg_init() urb->num_sgs is set 0 for sg_tablesize = 0 controllers.
> >>> In mt76 we set urb->num_sgs to 1. I thought it is fine, but now I think
> >>> this is bug. We can fix that without changing allocation method and
> >>> still use SG allocation. Attached patch do this, please check if it works
> >>> on rpi. Patch is on top of your error path fixes.
> >> your patch didn't apply cleanly to yesterdays next. After some minor manual fixup, i was able to build them and here are the results starting from boot (please ignore the invalid time in the kernel log):
> >> https://gist.github.com/lategoodbye/33bd5bc75b9fc935faa231bc472defa8
> > I think this is due to urb->transfer_length and sg[0]->length mismatch,
> > which should be addressed by my other patch. I'm attaching the patch
> > rebased on -next with this line integrated, please test. 
> >
> > But there could be other bug's in mt76-usb SG code.
> Will retry
> >
> >> Using multi_v7_defconfig i'm getting a warning on the first connect and always this flood of rx urb failed on disconnect. The driver seems to probe but isn't functional even after 2 tries.
> >>
> >> Using arm64_defconfig i don't get any warning. But except of this i'm getting similiar results to multi_v7_defconfig.
> >>
> >> So in comparison, Lorenzo's workaround behaves better.
> > I'm pretty sure problem is mt76x0u 4.19 -> 4.20 regression intrduced by
> > integrating mt76x0u in mt76-usb (things do not work from day 0
> > for mt76x2u). We should find fix(es) that will be proper for -stable.
> So i should also try 4.19 without any patches?

That would be good. Thanks.

Stanislaw


  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-14  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20190211173315.GE6292@redhat.com>
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1902111246410.1543-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
2019-02-12  0:06   ` [BUG] mt76x0u: Probing issues on Raspberry Pi 3 B+ Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-12  9:30     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-12 11:58       ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-12 13:15         ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-14  6:49       ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-14  9:25         ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-14  9:48           ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-14  9:54             ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2019-02-15  7:12             ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-16 11:05               ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-16 14:07                 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-16 19:17                   ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-18 13:52                     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-18 14:25                       ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-18 14:47                         ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-18 14:43                       ` Felix Fietkau
2019-02-18 15:03                         ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-18 18:52                           ` Felix Fietkau
2019-02-19 10:42                             ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-19 12:19                               ` Felix Fietkau
2019-02-20 13:00                                 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-20 13:22                                   ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-20 16:14                                     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-20 16:22                                       ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-20 16:32                                         ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-20 16:36                                           ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-03-03 21:16                                           ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-18 22:19                       ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-19 10:59                         ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-19 12:11                           ` Felix Fietkau
2019-02-19 15:40                           ` Alan Stern
2019-02-20 10:20                             ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-20 15:25                               ` Alan Stern
2019-02-19 17:02                           ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-12 15:27     ` Alan Stern
2019-02-09 12:08 Stefan Wahren
2019-02-09 18:46 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-09 20:29   ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-09 20:33     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-09 22:47       ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-10  9:41     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-10 10:22       ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-11  7:44         ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-11 10:04           ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-11 10:33             ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-11 11:06               ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-11 14:04                 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-11 15:10                   ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-11 15:27                     ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-11 15:57                       ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-13  7:05                         ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-11 17:22                       ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-10  9:29   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-10 16:38     ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-10 16:52       ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-10 17:39         ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-11  7:50         ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-11  8:08           ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-11  9:52             ` Lorenzo Bianconi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190214095420.GB17273@redhat.com \
    --to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=hminas@synopsys.com \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    --cc=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).