From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7028C43381 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 21:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F532085A for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 21:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="Lr8Js8ff" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730930AbfBRVtv (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:49:51 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:59900 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726955AbfBRVtu (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:49:50 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2BC7C7005C4C67E6EC0FFC5E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2bc7:c700:5c4c:67e6:ec0f:fc5e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 8C3991EC04F3; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:49:48 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1550526588; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=uys+NyVWP2GvLyuFgTpEgdk6WtP+kp1DTy4+1DKVLVQ=; b=Lr8Js8ffE5Nze7xsrc3+Z3i07x783BhgCJwyJ+Tyk0D9aVC8l1qku3wnfmuVdj3beR5y4w hDEH7xoU3sse257OkNTRHHSc0AP2EkmifyeUEyJYeNYIY2V9cE+4Kg8V+5Ci3K76QMbqc1 gqUCou8w/VG9eWowESXjI5P3p2WceY0= Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:49:40 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Kalle Valo Cc: Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H . Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lorenzo Bianconi , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Felix Fietkau , Matthias Brugger Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] wireless: mt76: call hweight8() instead of __sw_hweight8() Message-ID: <20190218214940.GI4265@zn.tnic> References: <1550469571-25933-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <1550469571-25933-2-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <877edxt1f1.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <87tvh0syq2.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <87pnrosy29.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87pnrosy29.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 09:20:46PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > So Masahiro, could you hold your x86 patch for a while until the mt76 > patch will be in Linus' tree? That should not take more than two weeks, > I think. No hurry - I won't take it into the x86 now and queue it for 5.1 because it is not something urgent or fixing a bug or so. It is a cleanup and as such it can surely wait for 5.2, I'd say. Unless there are other aspects which I'm not thinking of right now... Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.