From: Kevin Locke <kevin@kevinlocke.name>
To: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: linuxwifi@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "Coelho,
Luciano" <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [linuxwifi] [RFC] iwlwifi: enable TX AMPDU for some iwldvm
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 14:31:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190312203101.GA19902@kevinolos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b6eaef941d3bc887a9fbedea47c2677e5511cdd.camel@intel.com>
Thanks Luca and Emmanuel,
On Tue, 2019-03-12 at 19:47 +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-03-12 at 21:38 +0200, Luciano Coelho wrote:
>> If this feature was explicitly disabled, it certainly means that
>> something was causing problems with it, so I'd be wary to enable it
>> for all DVM devices.
>>
>> I guess we could enable it by default for devices that work fine, but
>> we would have to run it in real life for a lot longer with a lot more
>> different APs to be sure it won't cause any problems.
Makes sense to me. I can start testing with available APs. Let me
know if there is anything specific I should look for or catalog beyond
latency, packet drop rates, and bandwidth.
>> Emmanuel, do you happen to remember what was the issue, so Kevin
>> could test that specific scenario with this specific NIC?
>
> long long nights of despair.
>
> We had issues with reclaim path upon BACK. This is of course a firmware
> problem...
Does that suggest the issue may have been fixed by a firmware update?
For reference, I'm currently using "firmware version 9.221.4.1 build
25532" from the firmware-iwlwifi Debian package (version 20190114-1).
If it would be helpful, I could attempt to bisect the firmware
revisions to find the one that fixed it (assuming I can reproduce the
issue with a previous firmware version).
Thanks again,
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-12 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-12 17:12 [RFC] iwlwifi: enable TX AMPDU for some iwldvm Kevin Locke
2019-03-12 19:38 ` [linuxwifi] " Luciano Coelho
2019-03-12 19:47 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2019-03-12 20:31 ` Kevin Locke [this message]
2019-03-12 20:48 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2019-03-12 21:44 ` Kevin Locke
2019-03-13 4:58 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2019-03-13 15:06 ` Kevin Locke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190312203101.GA19902@kevinolos \
--to=kevin@kevinlocke.name \
--cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxwifi@intel.com \
--cc=luciano.coelho@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).