linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>,
	Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>, Roy Luo <royluo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mt76: fix tx hung regression on MT7630E
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 14:39:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190805123916.GA24209@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190805112719.GA12280@localhost.localdomain>

On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 01:27:19PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > ... but I think we have bug when do mt76_txq_schedule_all() in
> > tx_tasklet, because we can schedule on queues that are stoped.
> > So reverting 41634aa8d6db and then optimize by removing tx_tasklet
> > for mmio and remove not needed mt76_txq_schedule_all() calls looks
> > more reasoneble to me.
> 
> schedule a stopped queue seems not harmful at a first glance since we do not
> copy pending skbs if we have not enough room in the dma ring.

mac80211 stop queues for various other reasons than 
IEEE80211_QUEUE_STOP_REASON_DRIVER .
 
> Maybe we can be
> more conservative doing something like:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/dma.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/dma.c
> index d8f61e540bfd..c6482155e5e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/dma.c
> @@ -346,6 +346,11 @@ mt76_dma_tx_queue_skb(struct mt76_dev *dev, enum mt76_txq_id qid,
>  		goto unmap;
>  
>  	if (q->queued + (tx_info.nbuf + 1) / 2 >= q->ndesc - 1) {
> +		if (!q->stopped) {
> +			ieee80211_stop_queue(dev->hw,
> +					     skb_get_queue_mapping(skb));
> +			q->stopped = true;
> +		}
>  		ret = -ENOMEM;
>  		goto unmap;
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c
> index 5397827668b9..bd2d34c4f326 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c
> @@ -495,6 +495,9 @@ mt76_txq_schedule_list(struct mt76_dev *dev, enum mt76_txq_id qid)
>  	while (1) {
>  		bool empty = false;
>  
> +		if (hwq->stopped)
> +			break;
> +
>  		if (sq->swq_queued >= 4)
>  			break;
> 
> Does it fix the issue you are facing?

I'll not be able to test this patch this week. Will have access to
the hardware next week. 

I checeked before, if
'q->queued + (tx_info.nbuf + 1) / 2 >= q->ndesc - 1' is triggered
when MT7630E hangs and it is not. But maybe second part of the patch
will help.

Stanislaw

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-05 12:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-26 12:10 [RFC] mt76: fix tx hung regression on MT7630E Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-07-29 12:53 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-07-29 14:02   ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-07-30 13:54     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-07-30 14:55       ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-07-31  8:19         ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-07-31  8:51           ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-07-31  9:09             ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-08-05 10:01               ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-08-05 11:27                 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-08-05 12:39                   ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2019-08-12 11:50                     ` Stanislaw Gruszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190805123916.GA24209@redhat.com \
    --to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    --cc=royluo@google.com \
    --cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).