From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96617C433DF for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 07:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7780B207D4 for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 07:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725777AbgE2HF6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2020 03:05:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56176 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725308AbgE2HF6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2020 03:05:58 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7387AC03E969 for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 00:05:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bigeasy by Galois.linutronix.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jeZ5X-0006AG-Gl; Fri, 29 May 2020 09:05:55 +0200 Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 09:05:54 +0200 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Tony Chuang Cc: "kvalo@codeaurora.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Andy Huang Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] rtw88: 8821c: add phy calibration Message-ID: <20200529070554.h3vrap3lxlata6zn@linutronix.de> References: <20200520052335.22466-1-yhchuang@realtek.com> <20200520052335.22466-8-yhchuang@realtek.com> <20200528162727.57bxyoi76bqpacge@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On 2020-05-29 06:31:23 [+0000], Tony Chuang wrote: > > > +static void rtw8821c_phy_calibration(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev) > > > +{ > > > + rtw8821c_do_iqk(rtwdev); > > > > Why this extra step? You could name it rtw8821c_phy_calibration_iqk(). > > > > This is hooked at rtw_chip_ops::phy_calibration(). For 8821C, only IQK is > required. So just keep the name consistent. Ah okay. > Yan-Hsuan Sebastian