[PATCH] Revert "rtw88: no need to set registers for SDIO"

[PATCH] Revert "rtw88: no need to set registers for SDIO"

[yhchuang]

From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>

This reverts commit 07d0f5534935e2daf63a4e1012af13d68e089fed.

For rtw88 driver, the SDIO is going to be supported, so there is
no need to remove the SDIO related power sequence settings. And
while the power sequence parser will pass in the mask of the HCI,
the SDIO part will not be used to set registers accordingly.

Moreover, the power sequence table is released as a whole package,
so the next time if we are going to update, the SDIO settings will
be overwritten. So, revert this now.

Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723d.c | 40 ++++++++
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822b.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c | 20 ++++
 3 files changed, 155 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723d.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723d.c
index 8641ea645c4b..7422baf2d41b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723d.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723d.c
@@ -2093,6 +2093,16 @@ static const struct rtw_pwr_seq_cmd trans_carddis_to_cardemu_8723d[] = {
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_ALL_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
 	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(3) | BIT(7), 0},
+	{0x0086,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_SDIO,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(0), 0},
+	{0x0086,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_SDIO,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_POLLING, BIT(1), BIT(1)},
 	{0x004A,
 	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_USB_MSK,
@@ -2103,6 +2113,11 @@ static const struct rtw_pwr_seq_cmd trans_carddis_to_cardemu_8723d[] = {
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_ALL_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
 	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(3) | BIT(4), 0},
+	{0x0023,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(4), 0},
 	{0x0301,
 	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_PCI_MSK,
@@ -2310,6 +2325,11 @@ static const struct rtw_pwr_seq_cmd trans_act_to_lps_8723d[] = {
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_ALL_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
 	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(1), 0},
+	{0x0093,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, 0xFF, 0x00},
 	{0x0553,
 	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_ALL_MSK,
@@ -2389,6 +2409,11 @@ static const struct rtw_pwr_seq_cmd trans_act_to_cardemu_8723d[] = {
 };
 
 static const struct rtw_pwr_seq_cmd trans_cardemu_to_carddis_8723d[] = {
+	{0x0007,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, 0xFF, 0x20},
 	{0x0005,
 	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_USB_MSK | RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
@@ -2409,6 +2434,21 @@ static const struct rtw_pwr_seq_cmd trans_cardemu_to_carddis_8723d[] = {
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_USB_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
 	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(0), 1},
+	{0x0023,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(4), BIT(4)},
+	{0x0086,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_SDIO,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(0), BIT(0)},
+	{0x0086,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_SDIO,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_POLLING, BIT(1), 0},
 	{0xFFFF,
 	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_ALL_MSK,
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822b.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822b.c
index 6abcdf4070a2..e49bdd76ab9a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822b.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822b.c
@@ -1551,6 +1551,16 @@ static void rtw8822b_bf_config_bfee(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw_vif *vif,
 }
 
 static const struct rtw_pwr_seq_cmd trans_carddis_to_cardemu_8822b[] = {
+	{0x0086,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_SDIO,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(0), 0},
+	{0x0086,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_SDIO,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_POLLING, BIT(1), BIT(1)},
 	{0x004A,
 	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_USB_MSK,
@@ -1679,6 +1689,11 @@ static const struct rtw_pwr_seq_cmd trans_cardemu_to_act_8822b[] = {
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_ALL_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
 	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, 0xFF, 0x0c},
+	{0x0068,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_C_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(4), BIT(4)},
 	{0x0029,
 	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_ALL_MSK,
@@ -1707,6 +1722,11 @@ static const struct rtw_pwr_seq_cmd trans_cardemu_to_act_8822b[] = {
 };
 
 static const struct rtw_pwr_seq_cmd trans_act_to_cardemu_8822b[] = {
+	{0x0003,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(2), 0},
 	{0x0093,
 	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_ALL_MSK,
@@ -1775,6 +1795,11 @@ static const struct rtw_pwr_seq_cmd trans_act_to_cardemu_8822b[] = {
 };
 
 static const struct rtw_pwr_seq_cmd trans_cardemu_to_carddis_8822b[] = {
+	{0x0005,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(7), BIT(7)},
 	{0x0007,
 	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_USB_MSK | RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
@@ -1795,6 +1820,46 @@ static const struct rtw_pwr_seq_cmd trans_cardemu_to_carddis_8822b[] = {
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_USB_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
 	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(0), 0},
+	{0x0067,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(5), 0},
+	{0x0067,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(4), 0},
+	{0x004F,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(0), 0},
+	{0x0067,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(1), 0},
+	{0x0046,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(6), BIT(6)},
+	{0x0067,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(2), 0},
+	{0x0046,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(7), BIT(7)},
+	{0x0062,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(4), BIT(4)},
 	{0x0081,
 	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_ALL_MSK,
@@ -1805,11 +1870,41 @@ static const struct rtw_pwr_seq_cmd trans_cardemu_to_carddis_8822b[] = {
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_USB_MSK | RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
 	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(3) | BIT(4), BIT(3)},
+	{0x0086,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_SDIO,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(0), BIT(0)},
+	{0x0086,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_SDIO,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_POLLING, BIT(1), 0},
 	{0x0090,
 	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_USB_MSK | RTW_PWR_INTF_PCI_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
 	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(1), 0},
+	{0x0044,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_SDIO,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, 0xFF, 0},
+	{0x0040,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_SDIO,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, 0xFF, 0x90},
+	{0x0041,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_SDIO,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, 0xFF, 0x00},
+	{0x0042,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_SDIO,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, 0xFF, 0x04},
 	{0xFFFF,
 	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_ALL_MSK,
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c
index fe995bb4e43e..5e4cc57dbd7c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c
@@ -3563,6 +3563,16 @@ static void rtw8822c_pwr_track(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev)
 }
 
 static const struct rtw_pwr_seq_cmd trans_carddis_to_cardemu_8822c[] = {
+	{0x0086,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_SDIO,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(0), 0},
+	{0x0086,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_SDIO,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_POLLING, BIT(1), BIT(1)},
 	{0x002E,
 	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_ALL_MSK,
@@ -3773,6 +3783,11 @@ static const struct rtw_pwr_seq_cmd trans_act_to_cardemu_8822c[] = {
 };
 
 static const struct rtw_pwr_seq_cmd trans_cardemu_to_carddis_8822c[] = {
+	{0x0005,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(7), BIT(7)},
 	{0x0007,
 	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_USB_MSK | RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
@@ -3818,6 +3833,11 @@ static const struct rtw_pwr_seq_cmd trans_cardemu_to_carddis_8822c[] = {
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_PCI_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_MAC,
 	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(2), BIT(2)},
+	{0x0086,
+	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_INTF_SDIO_MSK,
+	 RTW_PWR_ADDR_SDIO,
+	 RTW_PWR_CMD_WRITE, BIT(0), BIT(0)},
 	{0xFFFF,
 	 RTW_PWR_CUT_ALL_MSK,
 	 RTW_PWR_INTF_ALL_MSK,
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH] Revert "rtw88: no need to set registers for SDIO"

[Kalle Valo]

<yhchuang@realtek.com> writes:

> From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
>
> This reverts commit 07d0f5534935e2daf63a4e1012af13d68e089fed.
>
> For rtw88 driver, the SDIO is going to be supported, so there is
> no need to remove the SDIO related power sequence settings. And
> while the power sequence parser will pass in the mask of the HCI,
> the SDIO part will not be used to set registers accordingly.
>
> Moreover, the power sequence table is released as a whole package,
> so the next time if we are going to update, the SDIO settings will
> be overwritten. So, revert this now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>

Oops, I was supposed to drop that patch but somehow I did apply it
anyway. Sorry about that, I'll apply this revert.

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

RE: [PATCH] Revert "rtw88: no need to set registers for SDIO"

[Tony Chuang]

> <yhchuang@realtek.com> writes:
> 
> > From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
> >
> > This reverts commit 07d0f5534935e2daf63a4e1012af13d68e089fed.
> >
> > For rtw88 driver, the SDIO is going to be supported, so there is
> > no need to remove the SDIO related power sequence settings. And
> > while the power sequence parser will pass in the mask of the HCI,
> > the SDIO part will not be used to set registers accordingly.
> >
> > Moreover, the power sequence table is released as a whole package,
> > so the next time if we are going to update, the SDIO settings will
> > be overwritten. So, revert this now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
> 
> Oops, I was supposed to drop that patch but somehow I did apply it
> anyway. Sorry about that, I'll apply this revert.
> 

It's fine :). Thanks.

Yan-Hsuan

Re: [PATCH] Revert "rtw88: no need to set registers for SDIO"

[Kalle Valo]

<yhchuang@realtek.com> wrote:

> From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
> 
> This reverts commit 07d0f5534935e2daf63a4e1012af13d68e089fed.
> 
> For rtw88 driver, the SDIO is going to be supported, so there is
> no need to remove the SDIO related power sequence settings. And
> while the power sequence parser will pass in the mask of the HCI,
> the SDIO part will not be used to set registers accordingly.
> 
> Moreover, the power sequence table is released as a whole package,
> so the next time if we are going to update, the SDIO settings will
> be overwritten. So, revert this now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>

Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.

dba5a189bf61 Revert "rtw88: no need to set registers for SDIO"

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11559339/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches