From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F79C433F5 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 08:36:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A87160E94 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 08:36:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240877AbhIFIhI (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2021 04:37:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37084 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240795AbhIFIhI (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2021 04:37:08 -0400 Received: from nbd.name (nbd.name [IPv6:2a01:4f8:221:3d45::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D872FC061575 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 01:36:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nbd.name; s=20160729; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date:Subject :Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=T1HzOaR/qo+2dPtlAtB/kb5FO7LzIPRj4r+bznF/YY8=; b=lom1tIDdLZ7112sZU2i+pVUjfq MMxYTyXUOPQpyYVdQEATal63XCPfYieM1uFJjeewujhpkUpH1vNnKnPhtD4XLQjNCckBgZcZS+ZpP +56zECD3f4qgVH1O2b9W37EaqCpApydDgMsiUQO4ocyz0ekCVuWyU5Axpvanqb6IWoN4=; Received: from p4ff13206.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([79.241.50.6] helo=localhost.localdomain) by ds12 with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1mNA6j-0007BF-Ct; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 10:36:01 +0200 From: Felix Fietkau To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net, Philipp Borgers Subject: [PATCH] Revert "mac80211: do not use low data rates for data frames with no ack flag" Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 10:35:59 +0200 Message-Id: <20210906083559.9109-1-nbd@nbd.name> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org This reverts commit d333322361e7a099dc74df2498d3fa5fde5c4fa7. Returning false early in rate_control_send_low breaks sending broadcast packets, since rate control will not select a rate for it. Before re-introducing a fixed version of this patch, we should probably also make some changes to rate control to be more conservative in selecting rates for no-ack packets and also prevent using probing rates on them, since we won't get any feedback. Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau --- net/mac80211/rate.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/mac80211/rate.c b/net/mac80211/rate.c index e5935e3d7a07..8c6416129d5b 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/rate.c +++ b/net/mac80211/rate.c @@ -392,10 +392,6 @@ static bool rate_control_send_low(struct ieee80211_sta *pubsta, int mcast_rate; bool use_basicrate = false; - if (ieee80211_is_tx_data(txrc->skb) && - info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_NO_ACK) - return false; - if (!pubsta || rc_no_data_or_no_ack_use_min(txrc)) { __rate_control_send_low(txrc->hw, sband, pubsta, info, txrc->rate_idx_mask); -- 2.30.1