From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-qk0-f182.google.com ([209.85.220.182]:34765 "EHLO mail-qk0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751152AbdE2JSf (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 May 2017 05:18:35 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f182.google.com with SMTP id d14so3949389qkb.1 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 02:18:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/9] nl80211: add support for PTK/GTK handshake offload To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless , "hostap@lists.infradead.org" References: <1493808134-4074-1-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> <1495030794.2442.21.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1de42f39-1912-349b-e20d-4b5c3c44909f@broadcom.com> <1495099355.2553.1.camel@sipsolutions.net> <4e0672aa-51bc-115f-32b7-b1a8eb747e5b@broadcom.com> <1495104012.2553.3.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1495189263.3274.4.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1495448886.2653.12.camel@sipsolutions.net> From: Arend van Spriel Message-ID: <29d43b7d-6cb6-0734-6a52-31fa98e9c1bc@broadcom.com> (sfid-20170529_111851_593793_C5E3A239) Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 11:18:22 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1495448886.2653.12.camel@sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 5/22/2017 12:28 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 12:14 +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: >> >> There is a (small) chance of regression with older devices as stated >> above and I would like to keep the fallback option for that. Also >> people may like to have a choice. I am not so sure about whether >> NEW_KEY support is enough or a new ext_feature flag is needed. I am >> inclined to say the NEW_KEY support is sufficient. > > Ok, your call. > > Note that this (checking NEW_KEY) only works when you don't have any > split between AP/client cases. Not sure what's the case for you. Late response so hopefully you recall, but what do you mean by "any split between AP/client cases"? Regards, Arend