From: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ath10k: add flag to protect napi operation to avoid dead loop hang
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:27:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2babbd5a3c48d41c2ef19371cc982784@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r1nzbadn.fsf@codeaurora.org>
On 2020-12-09 17:24, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org> writes:
>
>> On 2020-09-08 00:22, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>
>>> Just like with the recent firmware restart patch, isn't
>>> ar->napi_enabled
>>> racy? Wouldn't test_and_set_bit() and test_and_clear_bit() be safer?
>>>
>>> Or are we holding a lock? But then that should be documented with
>>> lockdep_assert_held().
>>
>> yes, ath10k_hif_start is only called from ath10k_core_start, it has
>> "lockdep_assert_held(&ar->conf_mutex)", and ath10k_hif_stop is only
>> called from ath10k_core_stop, it also has
>> "lockdep_assert_held(&ar->conf_mutex)". then it will not 2 thread both
>> enter ath10k_hif_start/ath10k_hif_stop meanwhile.
>
> Ok, but every function depending on a lock being held should still call
> lockdep_assert_held(), that way we can catch the bug if locking changes
> later. So it's not enough that ath10k_core_stop() has
> lockdep_assert_held(), also these napi functions should have it.
>
> I actually decided to switch using ATH10K_FLAG_NAPI_ENABLED with
> set_bit() & co, simpler locking that way and no lockdep_assert_held()
> needed anymore. Please check my changes in the pending branch, I have
> only compile tested them:
I checked, it only changed ar->napi_enabled to flag
ATH10K_FLAG_NAPI_ENABLED,
not found probelm.
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=pending&id=e0a466d296bd862080f7796b41349f9f586272c9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-10 2:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-28 12:22 [PATCH v3] ath10k: add flag to protect napi operation to avoid dead loop hang Wen Gong
2020-08-28 14:09 ` Krishna Chaitanya
2020-12-09 9:11 ` Kalle Valo
2020-09-07 16:23 ` Kalle Valo
[not found] ` <87d02x1rqb.fsf@codeaurora.org>
2020-09-08 3:45 ` Wen Gong
[not found] ` <010101746bd17881-819242de-7cbb-4df3-93e2-59473d281155-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
2020-12-09 9:24 ` Kalle Valo
2020-12-09 15:00 ` Ben Greear
2020-12-10 2:29 ` Wen Gong
2020-12-15 8:05 ` Kalle Valo
2020-12-15 7:56 ` Kalle Valo
2020-12-10 2:27 ` Wen Gong [this message]
2020-12-17 6:52 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2babbd5a3c48d41c2ef19371cc982784@codeaurora.org \
--to=wgong@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).