From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0552CC31E4B for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 18:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F9B205F4 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 18:44:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726297AbfFNSoG (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 14:44:06 -0400 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.62]:48006 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725889AbfFNSoG (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 14:44:06 -0400 Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hbrB6-0000fy-Qa; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 20:43:56 +0200 Message-ID: <309ba2702f6b553a3dd08262efe34c4cecc4e445.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] {nl,mac}80211: allow 4addr AP operation on crypto controlled devices From: Johannes Berg To: Tom Psyborg Cc: Manikanta Pubbisetty , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 20:43:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: (sfid-20190614_194548_687163_33C42843) References: <1557307533-5795-1-git-send-email-mpubbise@codeaurora.org> (sfid-20190614_194548_687163_33C42843) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-2.fc28) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 19:45 +0200, Tom Psyborg wrote: > > Never got reply. So I checked and definitely wrong version is applied > (v2 or v3). Why would that be wrong? I shouldn't apply v1 when v2 and v3 fix comments I had ... > Try to reproduce this yourself, I've posted details here: > https://forum.openwrt.org/t/wds-client-wont-stay-connected-prev-auth-not-valid-using-recent-snapshot-builds/38194/20?u=psyborg I might even have the requisite hardware, but not the required time now, sorry. I'm also not convinced how this patch would affect *staying* connected... it should affect connecting to start with? johannes