From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:64950 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756959Ab0HFRhc (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2010 13:37:32 -0400 Received: by vws3 with SMTP id 3so6327022vws.19 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C5C4860.2030507@lwfinger.net> Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:37:36 -0500 From: Larry Finger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= CC: b43-dev , wireless Subject: Re: Interesting development regarding b43 DMA ERROR References: <4C5B27BE.8010708@lwfinger.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/06/2010 11:31 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > Interesting. It means some patch that gone mainline fixed it and it > was submitted using other tree than w-t, right? > > Would you care to bisect this? It won't be fun as this is a 1.6 GHz Atom and a kernel build is quite slow. In addition, this one has the relocated SPROM that requires patching to be able to boot. In the interests of the community, I will do it. Larry