From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E78ECAAD2 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 14:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229635AbiH2Owu (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 10:52:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33492 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229540AbiH2Owt (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 10:52:49 -0400 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:4433::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C659B9082C for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 07:52:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=MATq9cViohvNjVqrLXPr+/0HuT0jF+UX+1mh3gCWcwk=; t=1661784768; x=1662994368; b=HVpIGRqUx+WZAn5nUxaEgOjKuMioiimhOSHsEi3MvaG/Eqr pn+xm+qAhB2Or0ztu4xksopiZ8ZyYWsaMNweLJH1k8Mpy9VdQv5NDcF0JGPQ3mRxnwHL2WaA+LtFX aMiCJq8wbvY4rnrNioWvi+ydRHoelp5p8RLSagFQvxQCzn+sfqNwLWQgkDavrvMxvZp3w0c3W/qID Iu78irrawJ83MdUqNSOaNMiDL60eLosMvgwHk9jQAf+r6bHJ5T2apsKrG4jWS6kzfzQX29JKO2zhu nJvKmVbAFjWgrrJlBSWpHJLDgvaX6urJxM7BFd2nX1d8IaF8X0wq8iA65YP6yvyA==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1oSg86-002poc-18; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 16:52:46 +0200 Message-ID: <50d80bebabe0ce2413af89af7bf45321ac7f0d6b.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] mac80211: add TPC support in control path From: Johannes Berg To: Thomas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=FChn?= Cc: Jonas Jelonek , linux-wireless , "nbd@nbd.name" Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 16:52:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8867d4a7552fc036da51ef5451ead1fd4df7f139.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <20220829144147.484787-1-jelonek.jonas@gmail.com> <5175b7f95442eff1f8e899feee3d3aeb330fb61e.camel@sipsolutions.net> <5AA24131-A7E9-451D-97AB-97D925B2A53A@hs-nordhausen.de> <8867d4a7552fc036da51ef5451ead1fd4df7f139.camel@sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.4 (3.44.4-1.fc36) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2022-08-29 at 16:52 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2022-08-29 at 16:51 +0200, Thomas H=C3=BChn wrote: > > > >=20 > > > > Compile-Tested: current wireless-next tree with all flags on > > > > Tested-on PCEngines APU with ath9k WiFi device on OpenWrt Linux > > > > Kernel 5.10.137 > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > That seems just a little old? Not sure I'd trust that given the major > > > changes in the tree recently? > >=20 > > Good point, we can test this with 5.15.63 by enabling the OpenWrt testi= ng kernel =E2=80=A6 would that be ok ? > >=20 >=20 > Well a lot of major changes just happened 5.19 -> 6.0, so something more > recent would be better? >=20 Maybe you could add support in hwsim? johannes