From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421EBC43331 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 20:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847A420870 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 20:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388907AbfIEUKS (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2019 16:10:18 -0400 Received: from nbd.name ([46.4.11.11]:55150 "EHLO nbd.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732468AbfIEUKS (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2019 16:10:18 -0400 Received: from p5dcfb5d4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.207.181.212] helo=[10.255.231.27]) by ds12 with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i5y5A-00084d-Fd; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 22:10:16 +0200 Subject: Re: iw scan dump for /AX attributes? To: Johannes Berg , Ben Greear , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" References: <8afa882e-64de-7c8b-49f4-ac318f395102@candelatech.com> From: John Crispin Message-ID: <55c26ec5-7745-1823-da2f-89abfcf30f6c@phrozen.org> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 22:10:15 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On 05/09/2019 21:02, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 11:20 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > >> Is anyone working on getting iw to print out /AX (HE) related >> info? > Good question, I wonder why we didn't do that. But no, we're not working > on it as far as I know, and I haven't seen anything from anyone else > either. > > johannes > Hi Ben, I sent patches recently for most of the AX stuff recently, got some local patches for scan, will post them soonish     John