From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D875C43381 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 11:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8588206B6 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 11:54:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2436757AbfBOLyT (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2019 06:54:19 -0500 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.62]:38994 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2404678AbfBOLyS (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2019 06:54:18 -0500 Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92-RC5) (envelope-from ) id 1guc4O-0006GL-Pl; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 12:54:17 +0100 Message-ID: <63fecadcf3f38f24b547143d9d53b3454adc417a.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 08/12] iwlwifi: dvm - EXT_KEY_ID A-MPDU API update From: Johannes Berg To: Alexander Wetzel Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 12:54:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20190210210620.31181-9-alexander@wetzel-home.de> References: <20190210210620.31181-1-alexander@wetzel-home.de> <20190210210620.31181-9-alexander@wetzel-home.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-2.fc28) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 22:06 +0100, Alexander Wetzel wrote: > When using Extended Key ID mac80211 drops @IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU for > the last packet which can be added to a A-MPDU in preparation. > > Don't throw a warning and just handle the frame as if > @IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU would have been set. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Wetzel > --- > > I cold not figure out so far how to make sure the card will not mix > A-MPDU frames. Looks like that is handled fully in the HW and I didn't > find any interface to influence it. (It even may work already, I have > some problems to capture A-MPDU frames with A-MPDU information intact > and the topic was pretty low on the list so far. After all it works...) You can't really do that, as far as I can tell, unfortunately. So this might be better in a "compat on steroids" mode? johannes