From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1A7C43381 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 21:06:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B617E2070B for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 21:06:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726086AbfBVVGe (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:06:34 -0500 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.62]:53338 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725900AbfBVVGe (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:06:34 -0500 Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92-RC5) (envelope-from ) id 1gxI1g-0006Ys-GG; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 22:06:32 +0100 Message-ID: <69e6577f90d99289acaa9853fe236e6f15f9e774.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 07/12] iwlwifi: Extended Key ID support (NATIVE) From: Johannes Berg To: Alexander Wetzel Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 22:06:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20190210210620.31181-1-alexander@wetzel-home.de> <20190210210620.31181-8-alexander@wetzel-home.de> <1a3b6e515c73a2c185e8dad84ab2ebfd8982a6ce.camel@sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-2.fc28) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2019-02-22 at 21:50 +0100, Alexander Wetzel wrote: > > No, but if you have a good test case we can check out what the firmware > > bug is and fix it. Perhaps not for all, but for the future at least. > > Maybe we can still figure out where it was introduced and thus see where > > it's good to use native mode. > > I'll verify if can reproduce the scrambled packets and will provide a > capture if so. Assuming that confirms the initial finding I'll be able > to reproduce that at will within minutes with access to a test system > having a mvm card. (I have some plans which will improve access, but > looks like that will take some time and efforts.) > > For now I handle that as low prio till we have generic Extended Key ID > support merged Agree > and I've had some time to improve my test setup and > hopefully have better access to a mvm card for testing. If all that's lacking is a few NICs then I'm sure we/I can help out with that :) > > > I also have tested patch for iwldvm using the Compat mode and I think > > > mvm cards will also work with that. > > > > No they don't, no firmware is available for that. > > So far I only looked at the dvm part of iwlwifi with only minutes spend > on mvm to port the NATIVE solution from dvm. :) > Are you saying that mvm cards can't seamless switch a RX/TX key to TX > only one? mvm seems to support SW crypto as needed and switching RX/TX > to TX keys is the only other requirement for COMPAT mode. No, sorry. I misread your statement. I thought you were saying "mvm cards will also work with iwldvm" rather than "mvm cards will also work with compat mode" :-) I think they all should just be made to work in native mode, the firmware basically supports this as you found, there must be some small bugs. johannes