linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ath10k: add refcount for ath10k_core_restart
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 17:18:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <725b4377f63c76627e1e68604323cb74@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87imdlkuw8.fsf@codeaurora.org>

On 2020-08-15 01:19, Kalle Valo wrote:
...
> 
> I have been thinking a different approach for this. I think another
> option is to have a function like this:
> 
> ath10k_core_firmware_crashed()
> {
>         queue_work(ar->workqueue, &ar->restart_work);
> }
> 
> In patch 1 we would convert all existing callers to call that
> function instead of queue_work() directly.
> 
> In patch 2 we would add a new flag to enum ath10k_dev_flags, or maybe
> should actually use existing ATH10K_FLAG_CRASH_FLUSH? Don't know yet
> which one is better. Now the function would do:
I thinks we can use test_and_set_bit for atomic operation athough it is 
same with restart_count.
and add a new flag, ATH10K_FLAG_CRASH_FLUSH is used for flush,
if still use ATH10K_FLAG_CRASH_FLUSH, it should change clear_bit of it 
from
ath10k_core_start to ath10k_reconfig_complete,because 
ieee80211_reconfig(called by
ieee80211_restart_work)
of mac80211 do many things and drv_start is 1st thing and
drv_reconfig_complete is last thing, drv_reconfig_complete done means 
the restart
finished.

I will send patch v5 with above changes if not other advise.
> 
> ath10k_core_firmware_crashed()
> {
>         if (test_bit(flag))
>                 return
> 
>         set_bit(flag)
> 	queue_work(ar->workqueue, &ar->restart_work);
> }
> 
> That way restart_work queue would be called only one time.
> 
> Though I'm not sure how ATH10K_STATE_WEDGED would behave after this
> change, it might get broken. Ah, actually I think even this patch 
> breaks
> the WEDGED state. This firmware restart is tricky, difficult to say 
> what
> is the best approach. Michal, are you reading? :) Any ideas?
> 
> And after looking more about this patch I don't see the need for the 
> new
> ar->restart_count atomic variable. Checking for ATH10K_FLAG_CRASH_FLUSH
> would do the same thing AFAICS.
> 
> And related to this, (in a separate patch) I think we should utilise
> ATH10K_FLAG_CRASH_FLUSH more. For example in ath10k_wmi_cmd_send() to
> not even try to send a WMI command if the flag is set. Basically all
> hardware access should be disabled except what is needed to restart the
> firmware.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-20  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-08  3:19 [PATCH v4 0/2] start recovery process when payload length overflow for sdio Wen Gong
2020-01-08  3:19 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ath10k: add refcount for ath10k_core_restart Wen Gong
2020-01-08 12:02   ` Justin Capella
2020-01-10 10:29     ` Wen Gong
2020-01-17  7:19       ` Wen Gong
2020-01-20  9:38         ` Justin Capella
2020-01-20 13:34           ` Wen Gong
2020-01-20 15:37             ` Justin Capella
2020-08-14 17:19   ` Kalle Valo
2020-08-18  8:39     ` Wen Gong
2020-09-07 15:52       ` Kalle Valo
2020-08-19 12:01     ` Wen Gong
2020-08-20  9:18     ` Wen Gong [this message]
2020-08-24  4:36       ` Wen Gong
2020-09-07 15:55       ` Kalle Valo
     [not found]       ` <871rjd37kz.fsf@codeaurora.org>
2020-09-08  3:47         ` Wen Gong
2020-01-08  3:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ath10k: start recovery process when payload length exceeds max htc length for sdio Wen Gong
2020-08-14 15:37   ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=725b4377f63c76627e1e68604323cb74@codeaurora.org \
    --to=wgong@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).