From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A266FC43381 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 18:08:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7650721736 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 18:08:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="dDmdOEhY"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="dDmdOEhY" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390095AbfBRSI0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2019 13:08:26 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:42446 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387806AbfBRSI0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2019 13:08:26 -0500 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E4C82608CF; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 18:08:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1550513305; bh=xCjBUogtWIOqJZsdmRtXiOBmgDLvp893h57ZpPCX8xw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=dDmdOEhYTB4RXWskygVmUXPMZ/rPdDYnOA2nlpyw3yQmLZ/zOgW3+9KLRub13wxR4 Wkc8atuV3wEHk7OO37OzpZEgujivVZ/qedzl2jkAGR1waUU/dm2pIsqagd5u9WRYwI b5/8cGWxRbLAHA92ZO7C/N78Km9Z676Hyyv42Ewk= Received: from potku.adurom.net (88-114-240-156.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.240.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83FD560388; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 18:08:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1550513305; bh=xCjBUogtWIOqJZsdmRtXiOBmgDLvp893h57ZpPCX8xw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=dDmdOEhYTB4RXWskygVmUXPMZ/rPdDYnOA2nlpyw3yQmLZ/zOgW3+9KLRub13wxR4 Wkc8atuV3wEHk7OO37OzpZEgujivVZ/qedzl2jkAGR1waUU/dm2pIsqagd5u9WRYwI b5/8cGWxRbLAHA92ZO7C/N78Km9Z676Hyyv42Ewk= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 83FD560388 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , "H . Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lorenzo Bianconi , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Felix Fietkau , Matthias Brugger Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] wireless: mt76: call hweight8() instead of __sw_hweight8() References: <1550469571-25933-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <1550469571-25933-2-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 20:08:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1550469571-25933-2-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> (Masahiro Yamada's message of "Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:59:30 +0900") Message-ID: <877edxt1f1.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Masahiro Yamada writes: > __sw_hweight8() is just internal implementation. > > Drivers should use the common API, hweight8(). > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Acked-by: Kalle Valo > This patch should go to x86 tree along with 2/2. > > Otherwise, all{yes,mod}config of x86 would be broken. > > This patch is trivial enough. > I want ACK from the net/wireless maintainer > so that this can go in via x86 tree. Sounds good to me, feel free to push via the x86 tree. -- Kalle Valo