From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132E3C43381 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 09:42:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70DF20684 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 09:42:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="oQlGYxs6"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="W76Qqrf+" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726375AbfCHJme (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Mar 2019 04:42:34 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:34376 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726238AbfCHJmd (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Mar 2019 04:42:33 -0500 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 66E0760312; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 09:42:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1552038153; bh=xKrOoRyrG7f6MlcFsAJgycT+EzXHIgdgK+iJaZZ/1R8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=oQlGYxs6dpuOpFiVAH1HCLfPIf3wiik+b8AYUjwbM2xME6WKR2MOhWc8gqv09BntT zTPAFbuOs2VFEoXom7K1BS9Rr1zLDCkslyoeuChM/GTOgH1m1M90+lglCtkHoRyaUd 5BQFu+HwEFhwpje74NhwTy/vUuGmXkOFq9iPgSmI= Received: from potku.adurom.net (88-114-240-156.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.240.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60D6860264; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 09:42:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1552038152; bh=xKrOoRyrG7f6MlcFsAJgycT+EzXHIgdgK+iJaZZ/1R8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=W76Qqrf+UlTJajCwQUyYZI095eSJJfsVf/gXYrF1ks4aMfMzNlGC+df7iJ08uyEjb WGHgDOZInJodAI2cZVN35NUR/4nkQC8GlIv2q3JSOzpJm2Mp7RP0zBt9TEoO7aUFya Mi7FY7TmNuCi4rA68JJMPW64ykP6FmaYsaUcTzdU= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 60D6860264 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Brian Norris Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82?= Kazior , linux-wireless , ath10k@lists.infradead.org, Wen Gong Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: support PCIe enter L1 state References: <1542163848-837-1-git-send-email-wgong@codeaurora.org> <20181115002836.GA71934@google.com> <20181115184333.GA87504@google.com> <87va4x8q2c.fsf@codeaurora.org> <87y36q75wr.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 11:42:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Brian Norris's message of "Fri, 8 Feb 2019 09:05:11 -0800") Message-ID: <87h8cd8zy2.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Brian Norris writes: > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:42 AM Kalle Valo wrote: >> No replies from anyone (including Wen) for 3 months about testing this >> patch on anything else than QCA6174. So I'll drop this now, please >> resubmit once test coverage is better. > > I know this isn't exactly what you're asking for, but FWIW we've been > using this since late November on all our QCA6174 products. No issues > seen as far as I know, and we have seen some power savings. Thanks for the feedback, this is very good to know. I also would like to apply this but not before we have some testing feedback from AP chipsets like QCA988X or QCA9984. Wen, are you planning to test those and resubmit? -- Kalle Valo