linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: <Ajay.Kathat@microchip.com>
Cc: <davidm@egauge.net>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	<Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] wilc1000: Add support for enabling CRC
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:25:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87im6geeqa.fsf@tynnyri.adurom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56ff1617-8d39-9dbd-0055-b3cee6d458ff@microchip.com> (Ajay Kathat's message of "Thu, 25 Feb 2021 04:58:59 +0000")

<Ajay.Kathat@microchip.com> writes:

> Hi David,
>
> On 24/02/21 9:17 pm, David Mosberger-Tang wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>> 
>> Ajay,
>> 
>> On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 13:35 +0000, Ajay.Kathat@microchip.com wrote:
>>>
>>> One more observation.
>>> I am not clear if the below block is really needed. Have you faced any
>>> issue here and did the below logic of skipping data helped to come out
>>> of it. Also checking the limit of 16384(2*8KB) byte looks odd when the
>>> max limit for data packet is around 8KB. Am I missing something here.
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +                               {
>>>> +                                       u8 byte;
>>>> +                                       int i;
>>>> +
>>>> +                                       for (i = 0; i < 16384; ++i) {
>>>> +                                               byte = 0;
>>>> +                                               wilc_spi_rx(wilc, &byte, 1);
>>>> +                                               if (!byte)
>>>> +                                                       break;
>>>> +                                       }
>>>> +                               }
>> 
>> Ouch, that's definitely not supposed to be there!  It's left-over debug
>> code from when I was tracking down the power-save issue.  Not sure how
>> I missed that.  Thanks for catching it and being so gentle about it!
>> 
>> How do I fix this best?  Do I resend the entire patch series or is it
>> OK to create a V2 of just this last patch?
>> 
>
> It's better to resubmit the complete patch series v2, as it would be
> convenient for Kalle to apply the patches in order.

Correct. This is also documented in the wiki, see the link below.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-25  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-24  5:51 [PATCH 1/4] wilc1000: Make SPI transfers work at 48MHz David Mosberger-Tang
2021-02-24  5:51 ` [PATCH 2/4] wilc1000: Introduce symbolic names for SPI protocol register David Mosberger-Tang
2021-02-24  5:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] wilc1000: Check for errors at end of DMA write David Mosberger-Tang
2021-02-25  8:27   ` Kalle Valo
2021-02-25 18:10     ` David Mosberger-Tang
2021-02-24  5:52 ` [PATCH 4/4] wilc1000: Add support for enabling CRC David Mosberger-Tang
2021-02-24 10:01   ` Ajay.Kathat
2021-02-24 16:25     ` David Mosberger-Tang
2021-02-25  4:50       ` Ajay.Kathat
2021-02-24 13:35   ` Ajay.Kathat
2021-02-24 15:47     ` David Mosberger-Tang
2021-02-25  4:58       ` Ajay.Kathat
2021-02-25  8:25         ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2021-02-24 21:19   ` Julian Calaby
2021-02-24 23:36     ` David Mosberger-Tang
2021-02-25  5:56       ` Ajay.Kathat
2021-02-25  8:22         ` Kalle Valo
2021-02-25 11:03           ` Ajay.Kathat
2021-02-26  7:09             ` Kalle Valo
2021-02-27 17:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] wilc1000: Make SPI transfers work at 48MHz David Mosberger-Tang
2021-04-17 17:48   ` Kalle Valo
2021-02-27 17:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] wilc1000: Introduce symbolic names for SPI protocol register David Mosberger-Tang
2021-02-27 17:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] wilc1000: Check for errors at end of DMA write David Mosberger-Tang
2021-02-27 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] wilc1000: Add support for enabling CRC David Mosberger-Tang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87im6geeqa.fsf@tynnyri.adurom.net \
    --to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=Ajay.Kathat@microchip.com \
    --cc=Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com \
    --cc=davidm@egauge.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).