From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE5EC433DF for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 11:04:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F442076A for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 11:04:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mg.codeaurora.org header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.b="Y5TWGPtc" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729403AbgFHLEk (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2020 07:04:40 -0400 Received: from mail27.static.mailgun.info ([104.130.122.27]:29990 "EHLO mail27.static.mailgun.info" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726202AbgFHLEj (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2020 07:04:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1591614278; h=Content-Type: MIME-Version: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Date: References: Subject: Cc: To: From: Sender; bh=OI32//NBlRdG4xdy8wSPzXyle8A7aj84ff/ipyP4/W8=; b=Y5TWGPtcxWJ8Go5Zc1G6d9SaeDPtvV9IfKUJPLQoXiNzYvL5of+bfDFwoD3tJEZAhD9kuqwY kZ76yLA2eYhWqcl3dRWguZKV5nD/24nnXkf4pCi7jFFS9ZpN0o1X7qFDQ785dszphnOsp9zr wUvM8mDsOgfW8S77CvW/Pre/cag= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 104.130.122.27 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI3YTAwOSIsICJsaW51eC13aXJlbGVzc0B2Z2VyLmtlcm5lbC5vcmciLCAiYmU5ZTRhIl0= Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n12.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 5ede1b455c89e47d73d108cb (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Mon, 08 Jun 2020 11:04:37 GMT Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DD00BC43387; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 11:04:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from potku.adurom.net (88-114-240-156.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.240.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44F69C433C6; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 11:04:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 44F69C433C6 Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] add 6GHz radio support in ath11k driver References: <20200603001724.12161-1-pradeepc@codeaurora.org> <871rmwl2d6.fsf@codeaurora.org> <97dabee94c4faecbc83bbd02baf3a798@codeaurora.org> Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 14:04:29 +0300 In-Reply-To: <97dabee94c4faecbc83bbd02baf3a798@codeaurora.org> (Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu's message of "Wed, 03 Jun 2020 10:50:53 -0700") Message-ID: <87k10hkede.fsf@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu writes: > On 2020-06-03 06:12, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu writes: >> >>> This patch series adds 6GHz frequency listing in ath11k driver and >>> mac80211 >>> registration for the 6GHz band. Also, extends some of wmi command >>> tlvs for >>> supporting 6GHz. >>> >>> changes in v5: >>> - latest 6ghz patches on mac80211 expects driver not to pass ht/vht >>> caps for 6GHZ band at device registration. so fix that. >> >> What are the dependencies for this patch? Is everything that is in >> mac80211-next as of today enough? > > Yes Kalle. current mac80211-next is enough. > >> >> Also what I do with Rajkumar's patch: >> >> [PATCH] ath11k: build HE 6 GHz capability >> >> Should I apply it before or after this patchset? > > Although there is no compile dependency with above patchset, there > will be 6ghz functionality dependency with above. So, IMO, its better > to apply after this patch set. Ok, thanks. -- https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches