From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>,
ath10k@lists.infradead.org, ath9k-devel@qca.qualcomm.com,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"Kalle Valo" <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: CVE-2020-3702: Firmware updates for ath9k and ath10k chips
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:17:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lfik1av8.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200812083600.6zxdf5pfktdzggd6@pali>
Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org> writes:
> On Monday 10 August 2020 11:01:26 Pali Rohár wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> ESET engineers on their blog published some information about new
>> security vulnerability CVE-2020-3702 in ath9k wifi cards:
>> https://www.welivesecurity.com/2020/08/06/beyond-kr00k-even-more-wifi-chips-vulnerable-eavesdropping/
>>
>> According to Qualcomm security bulletin this CVE-2020-3702 affects also
>> some Qualcomm IPQ chips which are handled by ath10k driver:
>> https://www.qualcomm.com/company/product-security/bulletins/august-2020-security-bulletin#_cve-2020-3702
>>
>> Kalle, could you or other people from Qualcomm provide updated and fixed
>> version of ath9k and ath10k firmwares in linux-firmware git repository?
>>
>> According to Qualcomm security bulletin this issue has Critical security
>> rating, so I think fixed firmware files should be updated also in stable
>> releases of linux distributions.
>
> Hello!
>
> Qualcomm has already sent following statement to media:
>
> Qualcomm has already made mitigations available to OEMs in May 2020,
> and we encourage end users to update their devices as patches have
> become available from OEMs.
>
> And based on information from ESET blog post, Qualcomm's proprietary
> driver for these wifi cards is fixed since Qualcomm July release.
>
> Could somebody react and provide some details when fixes would be
> available for ath9k and ath10k Linux drivers? And what is current state
> of this issue for Linux?
>
> I'm looking at ath9k and ath10k git trees [1] [2] [3] and I do not see
> there any change which could be related to CVE-2020-3702.
How about these, from March:
a0761a301746 ("mac80211: drop data frames without key on encrypted links")
ce2e1ca70307 ("mac80211: Check port authorization in the ieee80211_tx_dequeue() case")
b16798f5b907 ("mac80211: mark station unauthorized before key removal")
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-12 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-10 9:01 CVE-2020-3702: Firmware updates for ath9k and ath10k chips Pali Rohár
2020-08-12 8:36 ` Pali Rohár
2020-08-12 9:17 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2020-08-12 9:23 ` Jouni Malinen
2020-08-12 9:32 ` Michał Kazior
2020-10-07 8:25 ` Pali Rohár
2020-12-07 14:04 ` Pali Rohár
2020-12-14 17:41 ` Jouni Malinen
2020-12-17 9:35 ` Pali Rohár
2020-08-12 9:31 ` Pali Rohár
2020-08-17 9:58 ` Kalle Valo
2020-08-17 10:36 ` Pali Rohár
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lfik1av8.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ath9k-devel@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).