From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE61DC2BB1D for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC0E21D94 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mg.codeaurora.org header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.b="nupEI979" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729626AbgDQITu (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 04:19:50 -0400 Received: from mail27.static.mailgun.info ([104.130.122.27]:33974 "EHLO mail27.static.mailgun.info" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729176AbgDQITt (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 04:19:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1587111589; h=Content-Type: MIME-Version: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Date: References: Subject: Cc: To: From: Sender; bh=/7yKs6ysaSQ6o8f2hhWqkR0wQfyQw4kSJ38wV5CP0RY=; b=nupEI979668wpebWrSQutsiL4nzDK//yJN5YjfeQUchUQqnsLmXvLo3pXtTMIOSOGVs8Y2Ml RNKi82AkYzX28qy1W+DRn6HCkDAzxLRj3rUFY0+s10Jf9SqI897TxSTia1dr6yH18275bQ5d t1UOV238476zxXhbthDpC3lzX8A= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 104.130.122.27 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI3YTAwOSIsICJsaW51eC13aXJlbGVzc0B2Z2VyLmtlcm5lbC5vcmciLCAiYmU5ZTRhIl0= Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by mxa.mailgun.org with ESMTP id 5e996692.7fd03ae9d650-smtp-out-n03; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:19:30 -0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A0BC2C432C2; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from potku.adurom.net (88-114-240-156.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.240.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6CC7C433CB; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:19:27 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org C6CC7C433CB Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Cc: , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/40] rtw88: add support for 802.11n RTL8723DE devices References: <20200417074653.15591-1-yhchuang@realtek.com> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:19:25 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20200417074653.15591-1-yhchuang@realtek.com> (yhchuang@realtek.com's message of "Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:46:13 +0800") Message-ID: <87lfmuplrm.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org writes: > From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang > > Although RTL8723DE devices are 802.11n devices, while rtw88 > aimed to support for 802.11ac devices, the 8723DE devices's > architecture is relatively close to the 802.11ac devices. > So, add support for them on rtw88, with some minor modifications. There's no way I'm going to review 40 patches in one go :) So I'll just to look at around 10 first patches and drop the rest. If you want your patches reviewed smoothly submit only around 7-12 patches per patchset. If the patches are bigger don't send more than 7 patches. But if they smaller, or trivial patches, 12 patches is ok. But anything more than 12 patches and I'm sure you will get reviewers grumpy. But you can submit multiple patchsets, just try to throttle it down to avoid bufferbloat in patchwork, ie. send a new patchset every other day and document the dependencies in the cover letter ("this patchset depends on patchset B"). -- https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches