linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: <govinds@codeaurora.org>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	<ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] ath10k: platform driver for WCN3990 SNOC WLAN module
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 11:11:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lgf0cn24.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fb2c04383f024ab8b2c62dd5a4ad20ac@SOC-EX01V.e01.socionext.com> (yamada masahiro's message of "Thu, 8 Mar 2018 00:25:36 +0000")

<yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> writes:

>> >> Kbuild bot found an odd problem with this patch:
>> >>
>> >>  include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:77:14: error: 'KBUILD_MODNAME'
>> >>  undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean
>> 'KBUILD_BASENAME'?
>> >>
>> >> Full report:
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath10k/2018-February/010907.html
>> >>
>> >> Any ideas? Is this is some unrelated issue or what? This patch is not
>> >> even touching hif.h or ce.c.
>> >
>> > I didn't encountered this issue as in my defconfig only
>> > CONFIG_ATH10K_SNOC was defined. This problem is coming when we define
>> > CONFIG_ATH10K_SNOC and CONFIG_ATH10K_PCI simultaneously in defconfig
>> > and this is known issue when multiple modules share objects(in this
>> > case ce.o). I saw similar reported problem and found
>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10060825/.
>> >
>> > After picking the below change issue is not seen.
>> 
>> Let's ask the kbuild maintainer. Masahiro, any chances of getting this
>> patch applied anytime soon:
>> 
>> kbuild: define KBUILD_MODNAME even if multiple modules share objects
>> 
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10060825/
>> 
>> In ath10k we would need it as otherwise we are not able to link ce.o
>> both to ath10k_pci.ko and ath10k_snoc.ko. What do you think?
>> 
>> Full discussion and the ath10k patch here:
>> 
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10220657/
>> 
>
> I plan to submit v2, but even if the undefined KBUILD_MODNAME is fixed,
> I expect another problem from this patch.
>
> If both CONFIG_ATH10K_PCI and CONFIG_ATH10_SNOC are 'y'
> two instances of ce.o would be linked into vmliux,
> then causes multiple definition error.

Oh, I didn't realise this. Thanks for pointing it out. Govind is looking
at other ways to fix this.

-- 
Kalle Valo

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-10  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-15  8:47 [PATCH 01/13] ath10k: platform driver for WCN3990 SNOC WLAN module Govind Singh
2018-03-01 10:06 ` Kalle Valo
2018-03-01 10:13   ` Govind Singh
2018-03-06 12:41     ` Kalle Valo
2018-03-08  0:25       ` yamada.masahiro
2018-03-10  9:11         ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2018-03-23 11:54           ` govinds
2018-04-04  1:56             ` yamada.masahiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lgf0cn24.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
    --to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=govinds@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).