linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
	Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: Fix softirq/hardirq disabling in iwl_pcie_enqueue_hcmd()
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 19:06:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zgz7t246.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f103b4a29b7c1942f091bd7b90d7a927d72c20a2.camel@coelho.fi> (Luca Coelho's message of "Sat, 13 Mar 2021 18:32:26 +0200")

Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi> writes:

> On Sat, 2021-03-13 at 16:43 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>> On Sat, 13 Mar 2021, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> 
>> > > > > From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > It's possible for iwl_pcie_enqueue_hcmd() to be called with hard IRQs 
>> > > > > disabled (e.g. from LED core). We can't enable BHs in such a situation.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > Turn the unconditional BH-enable/BH-disable code into 
>> > > > > hardirq-disable/conditional-enable.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > This fixes the warning below.
>> > > > 
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > > 
>> > > > friendly ping on this one ... 
>> > > 
>> > > Luca,
>> > > 
>> > > Johannes is telling me that he merged this patch internally, but I have no 
>> > > idea what is happening to it ... ?
>> > > 
>> > > The reported splat is a clear bug, so it should be fixed one way or the 
>> > > other.
>> > 
>> > Should I take this to wireless-drivers?
>> 
>> I can't speak for the maintainers, but as far as I am concerned, it 
>> definitely is a 5.12 material, as it fixes real scheduling bug.
>
> Yes, please take this to w-d.  We have a similar patch internally, but
> there's a backlog and it will take me some time to get to it.  I'll
> resolve eventual conflicts when time comes.

Ok, can I have your ack for patchwork?

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-13 17:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-02 10:26 [PATCH] iwlwifi: Fix softirq/hardirq disabling in iwl_pcie_enqueue_hcmd() Jiri Kosina
2021-03-08  8:25 ` Jiri Kosina
2021-03-13  1:44   ` Jiri Kosina
2021-03-13  5:31     ` Kalle Valo
2021-03-13  5:49       ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-13 15:43       ` Jiri Kosina
2021-03-13 16:32         ` Luca Coelho
2021-03-13 17:06           ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2021-03-13 17:35             ` Luca Coelho
2021-03-22 12:12               ` Jiri Kosina
2021-03-23  9:13                 ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-23  9:25                   ` Jiri Kosina
2021-03-23  9:35 ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zgz7t246.fsf@codeaurora.org \
    --to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca@coelho.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).