From: Bhagavathi Perumal S <bperumal@codeaurora.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt: bindings: add new dt entry to indentify external FEM
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 16:17:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9632d0a95cf96d777081d2a1d3c12dca@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqLTxzFSQ6jvZo7CCcxBML6Y5j2AvAOotnVDJGTh-1K7ZA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2018-10-30 21:02, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 3:41 AM <bperumal@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 2018-10-16 00:54, Rob Herring wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 05:12:43PM +0530, Bhagavathi Perumal S wrote:
>> >> This adds new dt entry ext-fem-name, it is used by ath10k driver
>> >> to select correct timing parameters and configure it in target wifi
>> >> hardware.
>> >> The Front End Module(FEM) normally includes tx power amplifier(PA) and
>> >> rx low noise amplifier(LNA). The default timing parameters like tx end
>> >> to
>> >> PA off timing values were fine tuned for internal FEM used in
>> >> reference
>> >> design. And these timing values can not be same if ODM modifies
>> >> hardware
>> >> design with different external FEM. This DT entry helps to choose
>> >> correct
>> >> timing values in driver if different external FEM hardware used.
>> >
>> > 'dt-bindings: net: ath10k: ...' for the subject please.
>> Sure, I will change and send v2 patch.
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Bhagavathi Perumal S <bperumal@codeaurora.org>
>> >> ---
>> >> .../bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath10k.txt | 22
>> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git
>> >> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath10k.txt
>> >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath10k.txt
>> >> index 7fd4e8c..fbaf309 100644
>> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath10k.txt
>> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath10k.txt
>> >> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ Optional properties:
>> >> the length can vary between hw versions.
>> >> - <supply-name>-supply: handle to the regulator device tree node
>> >> optional "supply-name" is "vdd-0.8-cx-mx".
>> >> +- ext-fem-name: name of external front end module used.
>> >
>> > What are valid names? What if the OS doesn't recognize the name?
>> > Perhaps
>> Some valid FEM devices are "microsemi-lx5586", "sky85703-11" and
>> "sky85803" etc.
>> Currently driver accepts only "microsemi-lx5586", Since this FEM
>> requires different timing settings,
>
> Assuming you keep this, then you need to enumerate what are valid
> values in the binding. Otherwise, 'ext-fem-name = "rob"' is valid.
Sure, Will enumerate valid values in v2 patch.
>
>> And it can be extended for other FEM devices in future.
>> If OS doesn't recognize the name, it uses predefined default timing
>> settings.
>>
>> > this should be a compatible string for the particular module instead?
>> > Then it could cover any differences, not just the FEM.
>> >
>> No, it is specific to FEM device.
>
> You will be better off having either a specific compatible string or
> using VID/PID as this is a PCI device. Then you can handle other
> differences you may find between h/w versions without a DT change.
>
FEM is a part of wifi device, and not a separate PCI device. Different
external
FEM can be used in a same wifi device, so it might not be feasible to
define
a compatible string to cover any other differences. IMO we can go with
the property name instead of defining compatible string specific to
every FEM device.
>> >>
>> >> Example (to supply the calibration data alone):
>> >>
>> >> @@ -150,3 +151,24 @@ wifi@18000000 {
>> >> <0 141 0 /* CE11 */ >;
>> >> vdd-0.8-cx-mx-supply = <&pm8998_l5>;
>> >> };
>> >> +
>> >> +Example (to supply the external front end module name):
>> >> +
>> >> +In this example, the front end module is defined as a property of the
>> >> ath10k
>> >> +device node.
>> >
>> > Really need a whole new example for 1 property?
>> Will add this property in existing example.
>>
>> >
>> >> +
>> >> +pci {
>> >> + pcie@0 {
>> >> + reg = <0 0 0 0 0>;
>> >> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
>> >> + #size-cells = <2>;
>> >> + #address-cells = <3>;
>> >> + device_type = "pci";
>> >> +
>> >> + ath10k@0,0 {
>> >
>> > wifi@0,0
>> Added in ath10k@0,0 to make consistent with existing property
>> "qcom,ath10k-calibration-data" below,
>> "
>
> I don't see how that matters.
>
>> pci {
>> pcie@0 {
>> reg = <0 0 0 0 0>;
>> #interrupt-cells = <1>;
>> #size-cells = <2>;
>> #address-cells = <3>;
>> device_type = "pci";
>>
>> ath10k@0,0 {
>> reg = <0 0 0 0 0>;
>> device_type = "pci";
>> qcom,ath10k-calibration-data = [ 01 02 03 ...
>> ];
>> };
>> };
>> };
>> "
>>
>> If wifi@0,0 is preferable, then I will add new entry "wifi@0,0" and
>> add
>> ext-fem-name into it.
>
> Node names are supposed to reflect the class of device, not the model.
> See the DT spec for a list.
Will change accordingly.
>
>>
>> >
>> >> + reg = <0 0 0 0 0>;
>> >> + device_type = "pci";
>
> Also, this is wrong. Only PCI bridges should have this property. dtc
> will give you a warning on this.
Will remove it in v2 patch.
>
>> >> + ext-fem-name = "microsemi-lx5586";
>> >> + };
>> >> + };
>> >> +};
>> >> --
>> >> 1.9.1
>> >>
>>
>> Thanks, Sorry for the delayed response,
>> Bhagavathi Perumal S.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-07 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-04 11:42 [PATCH 0/2] ath10k: Add support to configure BB timing for external FEM Bhagavathi Perumal S
2018-10-04 11:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt: bindings: add new dt entry to indentify " Bhagavathi Perumal S
2018-10-15 19:24 ` Rob Herring
2018-10-30 8:41 ` bperumal
2018-10-30 15:32 ` Rob Herring
2018-11-07 10:47 ` Bhagavathi Perumal S [this message]
2018-10-04 11:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: Add support to configure BB timing over wmi Bhagavathi Perumal S
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9632d0a95cf96d777081d2a1d3c12dca@codeaurora.org \
--to=bperumal@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).