From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-gx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]:54230 "EHLO mail-gx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755568Ab0HMABT (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2010 20:01:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100812095546.GA3354@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1281550913-17633-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <1281550913-17633-4-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB0324110ABD@dbde02.ent.ti.com> <20100811184742.GA21778@nokia.com> <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB0324110AC1@dbde02.ent.ti.com> <20100811185724.GD21778@nokia.com> <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB0324110AC7@dbde02.ent.ti.com> <20100811212513.GC827@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20100812095546.GA3354@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 03:01:17 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] wireless: wl1271: add platform driver to get board data From: Ohad Ben-Cohen To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: "DebBarma, Tarun Kanti" , "felipe.balbi@nokia.com" , Kalle Valo , "Pandita, Vikram" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "Quadros Roger (Nokia-MS/Helsinki)" , Tony Lindgren , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Mark Brown , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , Nicolas Pitre , San Mehat , "Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan" , "Coelho Luciano (Nokia-MS/Helsinki)" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , Ido Yariv , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thursday, August 12, 2010, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 09:40:19AM +0300, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux >> wrote: >> >I've outlined a far simpler and easiler solution >> > which avoids this kind of abuse, and given suggestions on how to extend >> > it to support multiple instances. >> > >> >> Do you mean: >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg95338.html >> ? >> >> I was under the impression you eventually discarded that approach in >> that post. > > Indeed. > > I'm talking about my first suggestion: > > http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100804.114148.bf961e83.en.html > > which was later expanded by Vitaly: > > http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100804.140119.f476c29c.en.html > > I don't think anyone had any negative comments against that proposal. Thanks, I see what you mean now. I'll give this a spin when I'm back (I'm away until e/o August) >