From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:60973 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932273Ab0HJRje convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:39:34 -0400 Received: by vws3 with SMTP id 3so7758488vws.19 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:39:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4C618713.9030303@candelatech.com> References: <201008011137.49528.florian@openwrt.org> <4C55F377.6040404@candelatech.com> <4C618713.9030303@candelatech.com> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:39:12 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: virtual access poitns (ath5k/mac80211) To: Ben Greear Cc: Ryszard , Florian Fainelli , Patrick McHardy , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Ben Greear wrote: > On 08/10/2010 09:54 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> >> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Ben Greear >>  wrote: > >>> You would not believe how hard it is to keep up with the wireless tree. >>>  Last time, >>> by the time we had something stable, upstream had changed too much to >>> merge. >> >> This is why you should not do your development outside of >> wireless-testing. If you are doing development on a stable kernel tree >> then you will likely run into huge issues. You should do development >> on wireless-testing.git, always rebase when John has a new update, and >> break your changes out into a small changes as possible. If you follow >> these basic rules I believe you will likely have better luck with >> keeping your code up to date. > > That sounds nice, but at that time I was carrying a lot of other patches > needed to make my test environment work.  Fortunately, .35 pretty much > works out of the box, so I can develop on pristine upstream kernels now. Do not work on "pristine kernels" work on wireless-testing.git. Luis