From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:63312 "EHLO mail-qw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758123Ab0HFHHt (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2010 03:07:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1279733634-21974-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <1279733634-21974-4-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <20100804114147.GB6852@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 09:07:47 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/20] mmc: support embedded data field in mmc_host From: Linus Walleij To: Ohad Ben-Cohen Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Vitaly Wool , Kalle Valo , Pandita Vikram , Nicolas Pitre , Tony Lindgren , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Roger Quadros , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, San Mehat , Chikkature Rajashekar Madhusudhan , Luciano Coelho , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2010/8/4 Ohad Ben-Cohen : > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux >> >> Why not arrange for a small piece of code to be built into the kernel >> when this driver is selected as a module or built-in, which handles >> the passing of platform data to the driver? > > It's interesting. > > The only drawback I can see is that it has an inherent limitation of > having only a single wl1271 device on board, ...which is exactly what the *_board_info scheme in the spi and i2c subsystems is designed to solve. This is an established design pattern in the kernel with two precedents, what makes it so hard to implement this idea? There are plenty of examples all over the place. What mainly matters to me is that the stuff can be separated cleanly and in a nicely structured manner into board-xxx.c files in the mach-xxx dirs, which is possible also with the simpler approach so whatever... Yours, Linus Walleij