Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/10] bcma: add embedded bus

["Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>]

Hauke,

My idea for naming schema was to use:
bcma_host_TYPE_*

Like:
bcma_host_pci_*
bcma_host_sdio_*

You are using:
bcma_host_bcma_*

What do you think about changing this to:
bcma_host_embedded_*
or just some:
bcma_host_emb_*
?

Does it make more sense to you? I was trying to keep names in bcma
really clear, so every first-time-reader can see differences between
hosts, host and driver, etc.


2011/6/6 Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/bcma/host_embedded.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
> +/*
> + * Broadcom specific AMBA
> + * PCI Host

s/PCI/Embedded/


> +int bcma_host_bcma_register(struct bcma_bus *bus)
> +{
> +       u32 __iomem *mmio;
> +       /* iomap only first core. We have to read some register on this core
> +        * to get the number of cores. This is sone in bcma_scan()
> +        */
> +       mmio = ioremap(BCMA_ADDR_BASE, BCMA_CORE_SIZE * 1);
> +       if (!mmio)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +       bus->mmio = mmio;

Maybe just:
bus->mmio = ioremap(...);
? :)


> +       /* Host specific */
> +       bus->hosttype = BCMA_HOSTTYPE_EMBEDDED;
> +       bus->ops = &bcma_host_bcma_ops;
> +
> +       /* Register */
> +       return bcma_bus_register(bus);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/bcma/main.c b/drivers/bcma/main.c
> index 1afa107..c5bcb5f 100644
> --- a/drivers/bcma/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/bcma/main.c
> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ static int bcma_register_cores(struct bcma_bus *bus)
>                        break;
>                case BCMA_HOSTTYPE_NONE:
>                case BCMA_HOSTTYPE_SDIO:
> +               case BCMA_HOSTTYPE_EMBEDDED:
>                        break;
>                }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bcma/scan.c b/drivers/bcma/scan.c
> index 70b39f7..9229615 100644
> --- a/drivers/bcma/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/bcma/scan.c
> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static s32 bcma_erom_get_addr_desc(struct bcma_bus *bus, u32 **eromptr,
>  int bcma_bus_scan(struct bcma_bus *bus)
>  {
>        u32 erombase;
> -       u32 __iomem *eromptr, *eromend;
> +       u32 __iomem *eromptr, *eromend, *mmio;
>
>        s32 cia, cib;
>        u8 ports[2], wrappers[2];
> @@ -219,9 +219,34 @@ int bcma_bus_scan(struct bcma_bus *bus)
>        bus->chipinfo.id = (tmp & BCMA_CC_ID_ID) >> BCMA_CC_ID_ID_SHIFT;
>        bus->chipinfo.rev = (tmp & BCMA_CC_ID_REV) >> BCMA_CC_ID_REV_SHIFT;
>        bus->chipinfo.pkg = (tmp & BCMA_CC_ID_PKG) >> BCMA_CC_ID_PKG_SHIFT;
> +       bus->nr_cores = (tmp & BCMA_CC_ID_NRCORES) >> BCMA_CC_ID_NRCORES_SHIFT;

I'd use different variable as Julian suggested.


> +
> +       /* If we are an embedded device we now know the number of avaliable
> +        * core and ioremap the correct space.
> +        */

Typo: avaliable


> +       if (bus->hosttype == BCMA_HOSTTYPE_EMBEDDED) {
> +               iounmap(bus->mmio);
> +               mmio = ioremap(BCMA_ADDR_BASE, BCMA_CORE_SIZE * bus->nr_cores);
> +               if (!mmio)
> +                       return -ENOMEM;
> +               bus->mmio = mmio;
> +
> +               mmio = ioremap(BCMA_WRAP_BASE, BCMA_CORE_SIZE * bus->nr_cores);
> +               if (!mmio)
> +                       return -ENOMEM;
> +               bus->host_embedded = mmio;

Do we really need both? mmio and host_embedded? What about keeping
mmio only and using it in calculation for read/write[8,16,32]?


> +       }
> +       /* reset it to 0 as we use it for counting */
> +       bus->nr_cores = 0;
>
>        erombase = bcma_scan_read32(bus, 0, BCMA_CC_EROM);
> -       eromptr = bus->mmio;
> +       if (bus->hosttype == BCMA_HOSTTYPE_EMBEDDED) {
> +               eromptr = ioremap(erombase, BCMA_CORE_SIZE);
> +               if (!eromptr)
> +                       return -ENOMEM;
> +       } else
> +               eromptr = bus->mmio;

I though eromptr = bus->mmio; will do the trick for embedded as well.
I think I need some time to read about IO mapping and understand that.

-- 
Rafał