From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f175.google.com ([209.85.213.175]:37104 "EHLO mail-ig0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757595AbcBAEa6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jan 2016 23:30:58 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160201042548.GA4072@sudip-pc> References: <1454060944-11320-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> <20160201042548.GA4072@sudip-pc> From: Julian Calaby Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:30:38 +1100 Message-ID: (sfid-20160201_053115_509432_004DCEE9) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: fix memory leak To: Sudip Mukherjee Cc: Johannes Berg , "David S. Miller" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-wireless , netdev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Sudip, On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:03:35AM +1100, Julian Calaby wrote: >> Hi Sudip, >> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Sudip Mukherjee >> wrote: >> > On error we jumped to the error label and returned the error code but we >> > missed releasing sinfo. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee >> >> Should the From: and Signed-off-by: email addresses be the same? > > I think 2 years back I had a long discussion with Greg about this and > since then I al submitting patches like this. A small summayg of the > problem from that discussion: > > "we have strict DMARC check for the corporate mail server. DMARC = > domain based message authentication. > So the mail i sent reached all the list subscriber from a different > server than our designated server, and as a result it is marked as spam > in many places and I have already received a few complaints regarding > that." Ok, fair enough then. Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@gmail.com Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/