From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3614C38A2A for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 21:21:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85CA1217BA for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 21:21:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="QvR5r+EC" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727110AbgEHVVa (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2020 17:21:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55980 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726950AbgEHVVa (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2020 17:21:30 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x244.google.com (mail-oi1-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::244]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19B12C061A0C for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 14:21:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x244.google.com with SMTP id t199so9706445oif.7 for ; Fri, 08 May 2020 14:21:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=N9PZkEvg0UqwOeul+LmDtHPrfDAfpoLi3WzZZTZO9Zs=; b=QvR5r+EC/s7nKRmrIPJB9+wcnSguqIoCSuWgmQgXOJ01jjpfJHn0a7G1Qhhxv73fbz OuXycRAF6lZ2ccv0KmWauNE+3TQVvXL4S3qa39JaRrx2yJ5xSre4cnHfKuW/dNqR+7uA lrPQX/SGaqHH8p39Krr6H5cKL6pBla0gud6QfV6mp87kAzBHPPLW3xJgxC4jMpEX/fum k/Rmo36VbitRtS5kZDIaKvOSlL/ZbgO/nTTbBsHZHsmq5e/Iv6AVPNUurJE+M10+z/ef B/5LpdELvNXruz54C3LExQILVM4upf1vuDXUt5nMhy9Rnz/PiassPCw+yIB+PhF+J5Bl p3Kw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=N9PZkEvg0UqwOeul+LmDtHPrfDAfpoLi3WzZZTZO9Zs=; b=OTvyoiBkpgD18yYWrxCPAh4gIaxR7MkS1Effzf9TlGLI5R53v4ei8CzwCsMZ8rDcjE Smih86UPil0RwyTIbG+vGAeUWSrYQ8LQH9yZCOVaUjKwliXrZOcXXunSqyXNQXWc3HLU qfzf7VqDkdxnhWh5GyHan5WRfevEDe+Ab082h4NpwaWxkAFeHXfDXqFaAuZKlaPcwoIs ofz2n1asaSUskcL8+R7nXVUHl89bB2fDXzRAKBYAs9amY7bxxda0yZDyi682ZrY1tBqR a25m/506Z8kK5fNtKOYdUxQifaVzKVNRZf5XY7S8nPZnrlWiekQfd+YSBykJ0kIIk7/x hV/A== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaZyNSMo0vIz+SMl5Du+XYjPRwYEtPJIzrJfhKvSg7L1MdHyqaI gJCFqEleMfk3afsGfSP8eW88LenqVRaf8OiyzoNsXrd1VDY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLRAFs0Ig+sdCFg7zIuocU3BjY7qhmvASooe4AopGqK4UKF+uwSHESUcAsZbRS34q37UvimIwnIhIkRz14Ql8I= X-Received: by 2002:a54:4f1a:: with SMTP id e26mr11975844oiy.45.1588972888535; Fri, 08 May 2020 14:21:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200508140802.558267-1-luca@coelho.fi> <600179d2c1679b933e5129a3aac6c1f788a1c24f.camel@coelho.fi> In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?B?0JrQuNGA0LjQu9C7INCb0YPQutC+0L3QuNC9?= Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 02:21:01 +0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] iwlwifi: set NO_HE if the regulatory domain forbids it To: Luca Coelho Cc: kvalo@codeaurora.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Yes, it's something new. Because currently there is no any country where 802.11ax is forbidden. May be this change is not so useful or useless at all. Best Regards, Lukonin Kirill Best Regards, Lukonin Kirill =D1=81=D0=B1, 9 =D0=BC=D0=B0=D1=8F 2020 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 02:13, Luca Coelho <= luca@coelho.fi>: > > On Sat, 2020-05-09 at 01:10 +0500, =D0=9A=D0=B8=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=BB=D0=BB = =D0=9B=D1=83=D0=BA=D0=BE=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=BD wrote: > > Channels ON/OFF logic is OK. > > But I (and possibly not only me) bought a lot of ax200 cards. > > And now they all will work in 802.11ac mode without any reason and > > without any chance to avoid such behavior. > > That's something new, I think. > > The reason is regulatory. That may be new, but it's just part of > following regulations. > > -- > Cheers, > Luca. >