linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nico Sneck <snecknico@gmail.com>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>,
	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
	Yan-Hsuan Chuang <tony0620emma@gmail.com>,
	"regressions@lists.linux.dev" <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rtw_8822ce wifi regression after kernel update from 5.15 to 5.16
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 19:50:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAO_iuKG0gE=5fEKMF2A+iWUhsxtnPOQtTQTkBRo2vH5CmKu7iA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <023e90a9-01bf-4334-a69a-259705ffa55f@leemhuis.info>

Hi all,

On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 12:14 PM Thorsten Leemhuis
<regressions@leemhuis.info> wrote:
> FWIW, in the initial report Nico mentioned he tried to bisect the issue
> and there mentioned a few git commit id's which are from mainline, so it
> seems he tried mainline. But maybe there is some DKMS or akmod package
> that is interfering.

Indeed, I've reproduced this issue on mainline kernels, and also bisected
using the mainline kernel.
No DKMS or anything like that.

> Nico, it would help a lot if you could clarify the situation and maybe
> try another shot at a bisection.

Yeah, sorry for being slow to respond. These days I tend to run my personal
computer just on the weekends, thus this is a bit slow. Also, this issue is
hard to reproduce, usually it happens within a couple minutes after booting,
but I've actually now been running a vanilla 5.17-rc7 (commit: ea4424be1688)
for a day, and the issue just popped up.

So I can confirm, this issue is still present as of ea4424be1688
(soon-to-be 5.18).

This is how it appears when pinging my routers gateway address:
> 64 bytes from 192.168.10.1: icmp_seq=20846 ttl=64 time=29780 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.10.1: icmp_seq=20847 ttl=64 time=28771 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.10.1: icmp_seq=20848 ttl=64 time=27768 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.10.1: icmp_seq=20849 ttl=64 time=26763 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.10.1: icmp_seq=20850 ttl=64 time=25757 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.10.1: icmp_seq=20851 ttl=64 time=24752 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.10.1: icmp_seq=20852 ttl=64 time=23747 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.10.1: icmp_seq=20853 ttl=64 time=22742 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.10.1: icmp_seq=20854 ttl=64 time=21737 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.10.1: icmp_seq=20855 ttl=64 time=20734 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.10.1: icmp_seq=20874 ttl=64 time=1298 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.10.1: icmp_seq=20875 ttl=64 time=455 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.10.1: icmp_seq=20876 ttl=64 time=3128 ms
[...]
> From 192.168.10.107 icmp_seq=20925 Destination Host Unreachable
> From 192.168.10.107 icmp_seq=20926 Destination Host Unreachable
[...]
> ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available
> ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available
> ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available

At the same time dmesg is flooded with "timed out to flush queue"
and "failed to get tx report from firmware".

And just to reiterate; this does not happen on 5.15. Only 5.16 and up.

I'll kick off another round of bisecting now. Will probably take me at
least a week to follow up though. A lot depends on how fast this
issue pops up with each round of bisecting.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-16 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-14 19:25 rtw_8822ce wifi regression after kernel update from 5.15 to 5.16 Nico Sneck
2022-02-15  8:25 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-02-28 14:30   ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-02-28 22:07     ` Larry Finger
2022-03-04  6:33       ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-03-04 14:45         ` Nico Sneck
2022-03-07  7:39           ` Kalle Valo
2022-03-16 10:14             ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-03-16 17:50               ` Nico Sneck [this message]
     [not found] <CAFPFaMLHXhHMhuAuvXWHb3c-tX_9qRxsquEUHXY0fMxh_VsKtw@mail.gmail.com>
2022-04-04 14:49 ` Larry Finger
     [not found]   ` <CAFPFaMKpwmGqc_Cm1fv4psR6m+waax6YZO2ugOPhgmnG4mGJ4A@mail.gmail.com>
2022-04-05 15:02     ` Larry Finger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAO_iuKG0gE=5fEKMF2A+iWUhsxtnPOQtTQTkBRo2vH5CmKu7iA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=snecknico@gmail.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tony0620emma@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).