Re: [PATCH 0/7] mmc: sdio: Various fixes/improvements for SDIO PM

[Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>]

On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 17:34, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> The power management support implemented via system suspend/resume and runtime
> suspend/resume for SDIO cards is rather messy, but also fragile.
>
> This series makes some improvement to this code. In particular the so called
> powered-on re-initialization of SDIO card is quite questionable, I suspect
> it may never really worked well. Therefore this series removes this code, which
> helps to prepare for additional improvements on top in a later series.
>
> So far the series has only been compile tested, so any help in testing on HW for
> regressions is greatly appreciated.
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
> Ulf Hansson (7):
>   mmc: sdio: Turn sdio_run_irqs() into static
>   mmc: sdio: Drop mmc_claim|release_host() in mmc_sdio_power_restore()
>   mmc: sdio: Move comment about re-initialization to
>     mmc_sdio_reinit_card()
>   mmc: sdio: Drop powered-on re-init at runtime resume and HW reset
>   mmc: sdio: Don't re-initialize powered-on removable SDIO cards at
>     resume
>   mmc: sdio: Drop unused in-parameter to mmc_sdio_reinit_card()
>   mmc: sdio: Drop unused in-parameter from mmc_sdio_init_card()
>
>  drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c     | 92 +++++++++++++++----------------------
>  drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c |  3 +-
>  include/linux/mmc/host.h    |  1 -
>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>

I decided to queue this up, to see what tests from linux-next and
kernelCI reports.

Still, that doesn't mean I am appreciating test done on HW. I can also
apply tested-by tags by amending patches after this point.

Kind regards
Uffe