From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99444C282C2 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 02:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC402083B for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 02:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726157AbfBKCaF convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2019 21:30:05 -0500 Received: from rtits2.realtek.com ([211.75.126.72]:41073 "EHLO rtits2.realtek.com.tw" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726101AbfBKCaE (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2019 21:30:04 -0500 Authenticated-By: X-SpamFilter-By: BOX Solutions SpamTrap 5.62 with qID x1B2Tich011877, This message is accepted by code: ctloc85258 Received: from mail.realtek.com (rtitcas11.realtek.com.tw[172.21.6.12]) by rtits2.realtek.com.tw (8.15.2/2.57/5.78) with ESMTPS id x1B2Tich011877 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:29:44 +0800 Received: from RTITMBSVM04.realtek.com.tw ([fe80::e404:880:2ef1:1aa1]) by RTITCAS11.realtek.com.tw ([fe80::7c6d:ced5:c4ff:8297%15]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:29:44 +0800 From: Tony Chuang To: Brian Norris CC: "kvalo@codeaurora.org" , "Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net" , Andy Huang , "sgruszka@redhat.com" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH 24/24] rtw88: 8822b: turn rtw_write32s_mask into macro Thread-Topic: [PATCH 24/24] rtw88: 8822b: turn rtw_write32s_mask into macro Thread-Index: AQHUuV+dvM3bezbrhEu5gAS5rqj4sqXJoPsAgBBO8aA= Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 02:29:43 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1548937297-14660-1-git-send-email-yhchuang@realtek.com> <1548937297-14660-25-git-send-email-yhchuang@realtek.com> <20190201012446.GA103846@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20190201012446.GA103846@google.com> Accept-Language: zh-TW, en-US Content-Language: zh-TW X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.21.68.124] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org > From: Brian Norris [mailto:briannorris@chromium.org] > > Hi, > > > > > +static inline void > > +_rtw_write32s_mask(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u32 addr, u32 mask, u32 > data) > > +{ > > + rtw_write32_mask(rtwdev, addr, mask, data); > > + rtw_write32_mask(rtwdev, addr + 0x200, mask, data); > > +} > > + > > +/* 0xC00-0xCFF and 0xE00-0xEFF have the same layout */ > > Feels like this belongs with _rtw_write32s_mask() now, not here? Yeah. > > > +#define rtw_write32s_mask(rtwdev, addr, mask, data) \ > > + do { \ > > + BUILD_BUG_ON(addr < 0xC00 || addr >= 0xD00); \ > > You probably want parentheses around the 'addr'. You *probably* won't > run into trouble with this particular macro, but if the caller is doing > the wrong kinds of comparisons or arithmetic, this might not work they > way you want. Should add parentheses to protect in case of some coding mistakes. Thanks > > Brian > > > + \ > > + _rtw_write32s_mask(rtwdev, addr, mask, data); \ > > + } while (0) > > + > > /* phy status page0 */ > > #define GET_PHY_STAT_P0_PWDB(phy_stat) > \ > > le32_get_bits(*((__le32 *)(phy_stat) + 0x00), GENMASK(15, 8)) > > -- Yan-Hsuan