From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-qk0-f175.google.com ([209.85.220.175]:32955 "EHLO mail-qk0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S376348AbdEAI5w (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2017 04:57:52 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f175.google.com with SMTP id u68so6050116qkd.0 for ; Mon, 01 May 2017 01:57:52 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: brcmfmac: don't warn user if requested nvram fails To: Hans de Goede , "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: linux-wireless , =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= References: <09063fc2-af77-ced6-ed90-ab20e2884969@redhat.com> <577dc508-07ff-c74f-5c90-b6baf4e7694a@broadcom.com> <6cee092a-f8b7-f658-cd71-829f66559882@redhat.com> <20170427003616.GD28800@wotan.suse.de> <3ca61682-7267-c87b-2c3e-e4c185134cba@redhat.com> From: Arend van Spriel Message-ID: (sfid-20170501_105802_684812_6A3668CB) Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 10:57:49 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3ca61682-7267-c87b-2c3e-e4c185134cba@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 4/30/2017 9:39 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 27-04-17 02:36, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:53:57AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > >>>>> Right, sorry. For the pcie device I'm looking at the >>>>> name is brcmfmac4356-pcie.txt and I would like to propose >>>>> to first check for >>>>> "brcmfmac4356--.txt" >>>>> >>>>>> So who is going to provide these nvram files. We can not >>>>>> maintain that as there are too many variants and they are under >>>>>> control >>>>>> of the OEM/ODM. >>>>> >>>>> Users / people like me who are interested in using certain >>>>> devices with Linux. The idea is to at least make it possible to >>>>> have these devices just work. E.g. I would like a user to be >>>>> able to insert a USB-stick with a live Fedora 27 and then >>>>> have everything just work on the GPD win. >>>>> >>>>> To make this happen I will submit the nvram file from the >>>>> Windows install on the GPDwin to linux-firmware as >>>>> "brcmfmac4356--.txt" >>>>> and yes I've checked that there are sensible values in >>>>> the subsys ids. >>>> >>>> I suppose the "nvram file from the Windows install" than has a >>>> redistributable license? >>> >>> IANAL but I fail to see how the contents of this file is >>> anything but functional and as such not copyright-able. >> >> We take licensing serious on linux-firmware, a IANAL is no excuse for >> being sloppy. > > I don't mean to be sloppy. As I already stated I plan to make it > clear in the commit msg that there is no license info for the nvram > file and that in my non expert opinion that is not a problem. > > If people disagree then we will likely need to ask an actual lawyer > for advice and see from there, I think what Luis mean to say here is that you should be sure about this instead of submitting the patch and see what happens. In that respect I will inform internally what Broadcom policy is regarding the distribution requirements/restriction of the nvram files. Regards, Arend