From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:33091 "EHLO
	relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751043Ab0GVW4d (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:56:33 -0400
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:56:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	Chikkature Rajashekar Madhusudhan <madhu.cr@ti.com>,
	Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@nokia.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, San Mehat <san@google.com>,
	Roger Quadros <roger.quadros@nokia.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Pandita Vikram <vikram.pandita@ti.com>,
	Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/20] native support for wl1271 on ZOOM
In-reply-to: <1279733634-21974-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com>
Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1007230052320.12562@xanadu.home>
References: <1279733634-21974-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:

> This patch series adds native support for wl1271 on ZOOM.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> 
> - introduce a fixed regulator device to control the power of wl1271
> - allow to propagate private board-specific data to SDIO function drivers
> - allow SDIO function driver to control the card's power via new API
> - make it possible to keep the card's power down (without depending
>   on an explicit SDIO function driver power-down request)
> 
> Thanks to these changes, we no longer need a separate platform
> device (carrying e.g. the external irq information of the device),
> and no longer need to emulate virtual card detect events.
> 
> The two "board muxing" pathces were already taken by Tony, and
> are resent here just to make it easier for people to use/test these pathces.
> 
> The changes to the MMC core really needs careful review; there still
> might be some pitfalls that haven't been covered. E.g., one thing
> we plan to look at next is their bahvior together with SDIO Suspend/Resume.
> 
> Special thanks to Roger Quadros and Nicolas Pitre for their extensive
> review and helpful suggestions.

FYI, I do intend to review those patches, but I'll be flying home in a 
couple hours, and once there I'll be gone on vacation for 2 weeks.  So 
this review won't happen right away.


Nicolas