From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:34287 "EHLO mail-wm0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751662AbdHGTab (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2017 15:30:31 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id t138so1327682wmt.1 for ; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 12:30:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/34] brcmfmac: Tidy register definitions a little To: Ian Molton , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: franky.lin@broadcom.com, hante.meuleman@broadcom.com References: <20170726202557.15632-1-ian@mnementh.co.uk> <20170726202557.15632-14-ian@mnementh.co.uk> From: Arend van Spriel Message-ID: (sfid-20170807_213034_997085_FA05329A) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 21:30:28 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170726202557.15632-14-ian@mnementh.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 26-07-17 22:25, Ian Molton wrote: > Trivial tidy of register definitions. Initially skipped this one, but it is indeed trivial. Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel > Signed-off-by: Ian Molton comment below... > --- > drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h | 11 ++++++----- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h > index 4c81ea24d19c..fb4f24dfc99d 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h > @@ -51,17 +51,18 @@ > > /* function 0 vendor specific CCCR registers */ > > -#define SDIO_CCCR_BRCM_CARDCAP 0xf0 > +#define SDIO_CCCR_BRCM_CARDCAP 0xf0 > #define SDIO_CCCR_BRCM_CARDCAP_CMD14_SUPPORT 0x02 > #define SDIO_CCCR_BRCM_CARDCAP_CMD14_EXT 0x04 > #define SDIO_CCCR_BRCM_CARDCAP_CMD_NODEC 0x08 > + > #define SDIO_CCCR_BRCM_CARDCTRL 0xf1 > #define SDIO_CCCR_BRCM_CARDCTRL_WLANRESET 0x02 > -#define SDIO_CCCR_BRCM_SEPINT 0xf2 > > -#define SDIO_SEPINT_MASK 0x01 > -#define SDIO_SEPINT_OE 0x02 > -#define SDIO_SEPINT_ACT_HI 0x04 > +#define SDIO_CCCR_BRCM_SEPINT 0xf2 > +#define SDIO_SEPINT_MASK 0x01 > +#define SDIO_SEPINT_OE 0x02 > +#define SDIO_SEPINT_ACT_HI 0x04 So the SEPINT definitions are not consistent with the other ones. Maybe drop the SDIO_CCCR from the other value definitions and for the SEPINT replace 'SDIO_' with 'SEPINT_'.