From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655A0C43603 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 10:18:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE6B21D7D for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 10:18:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726545AbfLRKSz (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2019 05:18:55 -0500 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.62]:38774 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726698AbfLRKSy (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2019 05:18:54 -0500 Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1ihWPs-007ote-MF; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 11:18:52 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mac80211: fix issue in loop scenario From: Johannes Berg To: yiboz@codeaurora.org Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 11:18:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: <6f092bd44cfc581a219bd0f0506cc636@codeaurora.org> References: <1576221593-1086-1-git-send-email-yiboz@codeaurora.org> <1576221593-1086-3-git-send-email-yiboz@codeaurora.org> (sfid-20191213_082426_564220_0827923D) <94471b2381bee394f9708eae8ba47129f3facd03.camel@sipsolutions.net> <6f092bd44cfc581a219bd0f0506cc636@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 (3.34.2-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2019-12-18 at 18:12 +0800, yiboz@codeaurora.org wrote: > > Yes, this is a fix to the first patch. Actually, the rest of two patches > are also serve the same. So, are you suggesting to merge them to the > first patch? Yes. > Previouly, I had added Toke's signature in this patch but Toke advised > to delete it. I feel a little bit confused about how to handle it. > Appreciate any detail guide. I guess that you have to discuss that with Toke, how he wants to handle it ... If he gave you a patch with his signed-off-by, then you should probably keep it? There's also "Co-developed-by" tag to give some sort of non-author developer credits. johannes