linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
	"Arend Van Spriel" <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>,
	"Felix Fietkau" <nbd@nbd.name>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	"Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mac80211: set NETIF_F_LLTX when using intermediate tx queues
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:39:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e4c1a3ca0c0c160b7c271ab83deebcf096f38497.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190416093707.dtlwcmitzqopaeaw@gondor.apana.org.au>

On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 17:37 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:33:50AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 10:33 +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > > 
> > > > It is true because we have an entire buffering layer in mac80211 (in
> > > > this case at least) and never push back to the stack.
> > > 
> > > I'm wondering if we should be?
> > 
> > I don't think so? We'd just buffer packets in yet another place.
> 
> But you do realise that you're giving up on the rich queueing
> functionality that Linux provides (net/sched),

Yes, that was a trade-off we always knew about. The model that Linux
provides is just not suited for wifi.

> not to mention
> breaking certain applications that rely on congestion feedback?

This I don't understand. The congestion feedback happens through socket
buffer space etc. which is still there (as long as nobody sneaks in an
skb_orphan() call)

johannes


  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-16  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-16 17:06 [PATCH 1/5] mac80211: mesh: drop redundant rcu_read_lock/unlock calls Felix Fietkau
2019-03-16 17:06 ` [PATCH 2/5] mac80211: fix memory accounting with A-MSDU aggregation Felix Fietkau
2019-03-16 18:12   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-03-16 17:06 ` [PATCH 3/5] mac80211: calculate hash for fq without holding fq->lock in itxq enqueue Felix Fietkau
2019-03-16 18:13   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-03-16 17:06 ` [PATCH 4/5] mac80211: run late dequeue late tx handlers without holding fq->lock Felix Fietkau
2019-03-16 18:13   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-12-05  9:46   ` Wen Gong
2022-12-07  6:30     ` Wen Gong
2022-12-12  8:31       ` Wen Gong
2019-03-16 17:06 ` [PATCH 5/5] mac80211: set NETIF_F_LLTX when using intermediate tx queues Felix Fietkau
2019-03-16 18:14   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-04-14  9:44     ` Arend Van Spriel
2019-04-14 11:19       ` Felix Fietkau
2019-04-14 12:34         ` Arend Van Spriel
2019-04-16  7:34           ` Arend Van Spriel
2019-04-16  7:44       ` Herbert Xu
2019-04-16  8:04         ` Arend Van Spriel
2019-04-16  8:36           ` Herbert Xu
2019-04-16  8:37             ` Johannes Berg
2019-04-16  9:17               ` Arend Van Spriel
2019-04-16  9:29                 ` Herbert Xu
2019-04-16  9:33               ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-04-16  9:33                 ` Johannes Berg
2019-04-16  9:37                   ` Herbert Xu
2019-04-16  9:39                     ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2019-04-16 10:02                       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-04-17  2:11                         ` Herbert Xu
2019-04-17  8:28                           ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-04-16 13:13                       ` Herbert Xu
2019-04-16 13:18                         ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-04-17  3:38                           ` Herbert Xu
2019-04-17  9:09                             ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-04-17  9:16                               ` Arend Van Spriel
2019-04-17  9:17                             ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-04-23 12:41                               ` Johannes Berg
2019-04-25  8:35                                 ` Herbert Xu
2019-04-25  8:39                                   ` Johannes Berg
2019-04-25  8:44                                     ` Herbert Xu
2019-04-25  8:49                                       ` Johannes Berg
2019-04-16 19:13                         ` Johannes Berg
2019-04-17  2:13                           ` Herbert Xu
2019-04-16  9:38                   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e4c1a3ca0c0c160b7c271ab83deebcf096f38497.camel@sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).