From: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] ath10k: enable napi on RX path for sdio
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 16:00:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9db35228a09ccc14ac0ec31e9a10552@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tv7p1cz1.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
On 2019-10-31 17:27, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org> writes:
>
>> For tcp RX, the quantity of tcp acks to remote is 1/2 of the quantity
>> of tcp data from remote, then it will have many small length packets
>> on TX path of sdio bus, then it reduce the RX packets's bandwidth of
>> tcp.
>>
>> This patch enable napi on RX path, then the RX packet of tcp will not
>> feed to tcp stack immeditely from mac80211 since GRO is enabled by
>> default, it will feed to tcp stack after napi complete, if rx bundle
>> is enabled, then it will feed to tcp stack one time for each bundle
>> of RX. For example, RX bundle size is 32, then tcp stack will receive
>> one large length packet, its length is neary 1500*32, then tcp stack
>> will send a tcp ack for this large packet, this will reduce the tcp
>> acks ratio from 1/2 to 1/32. This results in significant performance
>> improvement for tcp RX.
>>
>> Tcp rx throughout is 240Mbps without this patch, and it arrive 390Mbps
>> with this patch. The cpu usage has no obvious difference with and
>> without NAPI.
>
> I have not done thorough review yet, but few quick questions:
>
> This adds a new skb queue ar->htt.rx_indication_head to RX path, but on
> one of your earlier patches you also add another skb queue
> ar_sdio->rx_head. Is it really necessary to have two separate queues in
> RX path? Sounds like extra complexity to me.
it is because the ar_sdio->rx_head is for all rx of sdio bus, include
wmi event, fw log event,
pkt log event, htt event... and ar_sdio->rx_head is a lower layer of
stack,
but the NAPI it to improve htt rx data's performance, it is only for htt
rx, also pcie has the same
queue in ath10k_htt for napi, but it only used for low latency.
>
> The way I have understood that NAPI is used as a mechanism to disable
> interrupts on the device and gain throughput from that. But in your
> patch the poll function ath10k_sdio_napi_poll() doesn't touch the
> hardware at all, it just processes packets from
> ar->htt.rx_indication_head queue until budget runs out. I'm no NAPI
> expert so I can't claim it's wrong, but at least it feels odd to me.
The difference of this sdio NAPI and pcie NAPI is PCIE's napi_schedule
is called in isr,
and sdio is called in indication_work of sdio rx, because ath10k's isr
is not a real isr, it is
owned by sdio host, and actually it is a thread.
When napi_schedule called, it will raise a soft irq in the same context,
it will block current thread
but not block current isr, in order not to block sdio host thread, so
called napi_schedule in indication_work of sdio rx is the best choise.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-01 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-14 11:47 [PATCH v6] ath10k: enable napi on RX path for sdio Wen Gong
2019-10-25 13:13 ` Kalle Valo
2019-10-31 9:27 ` Kalle Valo
2019-11-01 8:00 ` Wen Gong [this message]
2019-12-02 10:00 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e9db35228a09ccc14ac0ec31e9a10552@codeaurora.org \
--to=wgong@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).