From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72EA8C7618B for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E49421926 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726827AbfGXJfP (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 05:35:15 -0400 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.62]:50096 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726351AbfGXJfP (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 05:35:15 -0400 Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hqDg1-0002n1-TL; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:35:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC V2 0/8] nl80211: add 6GHz band support From: Johannes Berg To: Arend van Spriel Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:35:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1561461027-10793-1-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> References: <1561461027-10793-1-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5 (3.30.5-1.fc29) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Hi Arend, After all the discussion, I think we want this? Care to resend? I think I want it at least because we shouldn't advertise HT/VHT on 6 GHz as is (just as part of HE) and that's easier if we have a different band enum, for the capability storage... > The only place I could find an > issue with this is in cfg80211_wext_freq(). Not sure how to deal with > that so it is not part of this series. Just finally break wext and say if you want to use 6 GHz you need to use nl80211? :) johannes